Jon Gruden: "Bradford is definitely the future of this Franchise."

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
Now I can almost tolerate the guy...
 

bluecoconuts

Legend
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
13,073
Last night it sounded like he was about to say "If Bradford was playing the Rams would be blowing out Seattle" but he kind of hinted at it and then didn't expand further. I got the feeling he was thinking that though.
 

Username

Has a Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
5,763
It's funny what the "experts" say about this team once they are actually forced to watch it.
 

DR RAM

Rams Lifer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
12,111
Name
Rambeau
Last night it sounded like he was about to say "If Bradford was playing the Rams would be blowing out Seattle" but he kind of hinted at it and then didn't expand further. I got the feeling he was thinking that though.
Agreed. I felt the same way, BTW.
 

A55VA6

Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
8,208
Last night it sounded like he was about to say "If Bradford was playing the Rams would be blowing out Seattle" but he kind of hinted at it and then didn't expand further. I got the feeling he was thinking that though.
Pretty much. It was true too.
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,703
Complete 180 from "the Rams should be doing backflips all the way to Waco for RG3" or whatever he said last time he called a Rams game.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
Someone please post this on Rams Talk so we can watch heads explode...
Meh. What's the point. God himself could descend from the clouds and bellow at the top of his mighty lungs, "BRADFORD IS THE CHOSEN ONE!", and you'd STILL get some dipshit on RamStalk try argue QBR with him.
 

LumberTubs

As idle as a painted ship upon a painted ocean
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
1,424
Name
Phil
Gruden was very complimentary about our D too. Obviously, watching our front four molest Wilson and his o-line all night, you could only be complimentary about it but looking at headlines around the internet, the focus has been mainly on the She-whores and how cr@ppy they were rather than how dominant Quinn, Long et al were for all four quarters

Edit: just saw there's a whole thread already dedicated to this
 

BigRamFan

Super Bowl XXXVI was rigged!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
2,892
Name
Craig
Last night it sounded like he was about to say "If Bradford was playing the Rams would be blowing out Seattle" but he kind of hinted at it and then didn't expand further. I got the feeling he was thinking that though.

I know I was thinking exactly that!
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
It was pretty funny when he mocked the fumble review on the field with the official in the booth and then turned out to be wrong. I did enjoy that.
 

bwdenverram

Legend
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
5,519
Name
BW
Saying all that before the game, love to hear him after the game. But was a fair assesment and pretty much what we already know.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,832
It was pretty funny when he mocked the fumble review on the field with the official in the booth and then turned out to be wrong. I did enjoy that.

Eh, that was one of the few times I agreed with him. There's supposed to be indisputable evidence. Can anyone really tell me that the evidence was indisputable on that play? The ball came out right on the borderline between the arm moving forward and the arm going backwards. Can't see how they could make a conclusive call on that one.
 

PhxRam

Guest
Eh, that was one of the few times I agreed with him. There's supposed to be indisputable evidence. Can anyone really tell me that the evidence was indisputable on that play? The ball came out right on the borderline between the arm moving forward and the arm going backwards. Can't see how they could make a conclusive call on that one.

My only real complaint was when the in-house ref said that the fumble caused the ball to travel 12 yards down the field. Okay.. :rolleyes:
 

Napa Jack

UDFA
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
42
"Definitely" - I don't know I would use that word.

My only real complaint was when the in-house ref said that the fumble caused the ball to travel 12 yards down the field. Okay.. :rolleyes:

So what they are saying is, it isn't possible to throw a ball forward unless you have a full grip on the ball. I want to see that one administrated moving forward.

The Ram defense IS pretty good. But, the Seahawks were using back-ups all over the line, (Ram fans know how that works out) and Harvin wasn't there. When they are at full strength, they are the best team in the Division, if not in all of football. And with that cocky attitude many of them display, I find them the most unlikable as well.

The Rams appear this year to be where they are every year - just a couple of wide receivers, pass protectors, run blockers, and a running back away from being a decent NFL team. Now you add qb to the that list. Are we talking next year's draft picks yet?
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
Eh, that was one of the few times I agreed with him. There's supposed to be indisputable evidence. Can anyone really tell me that the evidence was indisputable on that play? The ball came out right on the borderline between the arm moving forward and the arm going backwards. Can't see how they could make a conclusive call on that one.
I'm witcha jrry ESPECIALLY SINCE the OBJECT of throwing the ball is to GET IT MOVING FORWARD AND LET GO