Jaw's 2014 QB Rankings: Bradford #24

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

PrometheusFaulk

Starter
Joined
May 25, 2013
Messages
618
As far as one single position goes, it's hard to see how any other position is more important than QB on a football team. Now, is a good QB more valuable than an entire good defense? No. But what single position would you take over a good QB?

My position is not that there is a single position that I would take over another. My position is that they are all of equal importance. Importance by my definition in this context meaning inherent, on the field value towards winning football games.

If you were to perform a study on any past Super Bowl champion, I would venture that you would never find a constant among teams in terms of which positions were filled by elite players, which were filled by good players, which were filled by role players, and which were filled by replacement level players (terms I use to tier, I can specify if you wish and that's too vague). The constant you would find is that every champion had these elite players somewhere, at disparate positions, and that the quantity of replacement level players was minimal.

Read: where the position was was not as important as the fact that the team had several elite ones, and few to no really bad ones.

The conclusion I draw from this is that there is no one position more valuable than others, inherently. There may be positions where it is more rare to find an elite player, and I would argue a good justification for why they're paid more. You may find positions that handle the ball more or have more tasks. But I would argue that's not directly related to "responsibility for wins."

Wins and losses, and subsequently importance, IMO, is equally disbursed among every man who steps on that field.
 

rhinobean

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Messages
2,152
Name
Bob
Bradford 24th in Jaworski's QB rankings
By Nate Latsch

http://stl.scout.com/2/1421268.html

ST. LOUIS — ESPN’s Ron Jaworski rated the Rams’ Sam Bradford as the 24th-best starting quarterback going into the 2014 season.
“Bradford remains a talented passer with excellent arm strength,” Jaworski said during ESPN’s SportsCenter segment. “He can make every throw with velocity, tough and accuracy.”

“Bradford is primarily a pocket quarterback,” Jaworski continued. “When he’s well-protected and comfortable in the pocket, he can be a high-level passer. He has shown flashes of that in his four-year career.”

The No. 1 pick in the 2010 NFL Draft out of the University of Oklahoma, Bradford put up good numbers in his seven starts in 2013 before suffering a season-ending knee injury. He completed 60.7 percent of his passes, with 14 touchdowns and four interceptions, and a passer rating of 90.9.

“Bradford’s struggles have often resulted from his unrefined feel for pocket movement,” Jaworski said. “There are times he seems anchored in the pocket, unable to move and reset.

“Third down has also been a problem for Bradford. In 2013, in his seven starts before an ACL tear ended his season, he completed less than 50 percent of his passes. He must improve on that critical down to become a more consistent quarterback.”

Bradford completed 68 percent of his passes on first down in 2013, then 62.4 percent on second down and 49.3 percent on third down. In his four-year career Bradford has completed 51.9 percent of his passes on third down.

No. 23 on Jaws’ list was Ryan Tannehill of the Miami Dolphins.
"Stats are like a lamppost, they can illuminate or they can hold you up"! Not my quote but it seems to apply here!
 

PrometheusFaulk

Starter
Joined
May 25, 2013
Messages
618

I would hope so, they were the five best years guys have had at the position (IMO) ever! :)

But that still doesn't clarify for me why if it's the most important position why these five all time great years from players who man the most important position on the field don't have any rings to show for those efforts as a result of those years.

I'm likely belaboring what is a semantic point, and in a fashion that might be interpreted as churlish, I apologize because I've always enjoyed your posts here. But it's an "important" word for me in this context. I simply can't agree with the mantra.
 

HE WITH HORNS

Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
3,821
Wussel Wilson is NOT a legitimate QB, he gets by with his #1 defense and the #1 running game. If he had to throw for a living, he's just another guy.
 

PrometheusFaulk

Starter
Joined
May 25, 2013
Messages
618

"Cherry picking?" I suppose you could look at it that way. I was just going off of record breaking passing seasons. I hadn't heard too many people refer to Marino's '84 season as "the 16th best season by QB rating" most folks I encounter just remember it as the year he broke the TD and yardage records. I'm sorry you didn't like my examples, I'll try to do better next time.

I don't agree that rule changes effect positional importance, this is more of an idea based on the fundamental construct of the game. I'm just attempting to use examples to illustrate an intangible principle about the sport that I believe. It's hard to demonstrate exactly.

I think some folks may be able to do that better than I can. But I know there are some old ball coaches out there who don't think "a chain is only as strong as it's weakest link" is just euphemism or feel-goodery. They feel it's true, as I do.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
21,515
This is "point on"...Jaworski is a fair analyst of QBs. I like the point he makes too because a good QBs confidence can be ruined in a system that doesn't suit his attributes. We've seen QBs go down the drain because they were not in a system suited to what they do best.

I disagree that Jaws is a good analyst of QBs. I read his gushing and glowing reports on Kaepernick and it soured me on him. Not because Kaep is a Niner but because the Guy cannot even read the entire field. It kind of shows lack of mental acumen when QBing. Yet Jaws labelled him as possibly the best QB to ever play the game.
 

blue4

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,126
Name
blue4
1994 - Steve Young
1995 - Troy Aikman
1996 - Brett Favre
1997 - John Elway
1998 - John Elway
1999 - Kurt Warner
2000 - Trent Dilfer
2001 - Tom Brady
2002 - Brad Johnson
2003 - Tom Brady
2004 - Tom Brady
2005 - Ben Roethlisberger
2006 - Peyton Manning
2007 - Eli Manning
2008 - Ben Roethlisberger
2009 - Drew Brees
2010 - Aaron Rodgers
2011 - Eli Manning
2012 - Joe Flacco

2013 - Russell Wilson

Out of the last 20 years, I see 3-5 guys who weren't obviously pro-bowl caliber and Eli's a debatable example. So, Dilfer and Brad Johnson rode their way to a title but everyone else had a pro-bowl/HOF level QB that either helped them get to and/or win the big game.

I never said it didn't help, just that it wasn't necessary. With the exception of us in 99, those SB winners didn't control the line of scrimmage? I'm not minimizing the QB position, I'm simply responding to people who overrate the position.
Also, I realize this is nitpicking, but Wilson made it because of his defense. I don't see how a guy who is 32nd in attempts makes the Pro Bowl.
 

Barrison

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
2,507
Name
Barry
Not to say those positions don't have value but look at Ogden in Baltimore. Sure, they won it all because of their defense but they spent years trying to find a suitable QB. Or Jones in Seattle. They had Hasslebeck who was alright but they also spent a long while trying to find the right guy at QB while they had elite LT play. If one has to make a choice, I think it has to be QB over LT.
I think he's saying a Lawrence Taylor type OLB bruh.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
15,957
.

qb is easily the most important position on the team. That's why teams pay the good ones the most by far. that's why teams that have good ones are usually good and teams that don't have good ones are usually awful and are always looking for one.

.
 

blue4

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,126
Name
blue4

That's exactly my point. Teams that control the line of scrimmage win games. Do that and an elite QB is not required. Good to have, not required.
One could argue that an elite QB salary actually forces you to win with a weaker team, long term.
 

cracengl

Rookie
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
360
I don't disagree with a lot of what he says. I think the difference is that if the coaches didn't think he had the ability to be better, they wouldn't keep him around. Or maybe they would because of the contract, but I doubt they'd be as openly supportive of him. I look at it like this: Sam has another year to really prove his worth. IF he does that (I think he will) great. If not, whoever they draft to replace him is going to be put into a 1000% times better situation because he will have a good team around him. They took Bradford when they had nothing and threw him to the wolves, hoping marginal talent would develop around him or that they could buy overpriced free agents on the line to protect him. It didn't work. To the other point about Sam's 3rd down work, let's revisit that after this year. I think the offense is going to be improved enough that the 3rd down attempts are going to be shorter yardage situations, which should increase the efficiency.
 

BigRamFan

Super Bowl XXXVI was rigged!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
2,886
Name
Craig
Mt. Rush More!

I like!
Come on @RamzFanz or @-X- , or anyone else who is interested, use those photoshop/video skills you guys have and put together a Mt. Rush More "logo" with our DL faces. Then maybe it could be gotten into Mr. Demoff's hands for use this season!
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
1994 - Steve Young
1995 - Troy Aikman
1996 - Brett Favre
1997 - John Elway
1998 - John Elway
1999 - Kurt Warner
2000 - Trent Dilfer
2001 - Tom Brady
2002 - Brad Johnson
2003 - Tom Brady
2004 - Tom Brady
2005 - Ben Roethlisberger
2006 - Peyton Manning
2007 - Eli Manning
2008 - Ben Roethlisberger
2009 - Drew Brees
2010 - Aaron Rodgers
2011 - Eli Manning
2012 - Joe Flacco

2013 - Russell Wilson

Out of the last 20 years, I see 3-5 guys who weren't obviously pro-bowl caliber and Eli's a debatable example. So, Dilfer and Brad Johnson rode their way to a title but everyone else had a pro-bowl/HOF level QB that either helped them get to and/or win the big game.

Yes, and why this discussion is always "SB winner" is somethinjg I don't understand.......what about playoff teams or teams that make it to the divisional round? Regardless of how you slice it if you don't have a top tier QB the odds of getting deep into the playoffs, into the SB or winning the SB go WAY down.

If you don't have an excellent QB you better have a top tier defense.
 

blue4

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,126
Name
blue4
The NFC championship game had, and the two best teams in the NFL have, QBs who are unaware that teams have more than two options to throw to. It's better to be healthy and deep in the lines than have an elite QB IMO.
 

RamsAndEwe

Rookie
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
421
As far as one single position goes, it's hard to see how any other position is more important than QB on a football team. Now, is a good QB more valuable than an entire good defense? No. But what single position would you take over a good QB?

Quarterback is the most important position. End of story. So I would take a great QB. But the Ram's shortest path to a great offensive is a fantastic offensive coordinator.