1. To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Jaw's 2014 QB Rankings: Bradford #24

Discussion in 'RAMS - NFL TALK' started by Prime Time, Jul 14, 2014.

  1. Prime Time

    Staff
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2014
    Messages:
    11,411
    Likes Received:
    13,891
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    retired
    Location:
    Cumberland, Maryland
    Ron Jaworski: Matt Cassel is the worst starting QB in the NFL
    Posted by Michael David Smith on July 14, 2014

    [​IMG]AP

    Former NFL quarterback and current ESPN analyst Ron Jaworski is unveiling his annual ranking of the NFL’s 32 starting quarterbacks, and the list started with Vikings quarterback Matt Cassel. And not because Cassel is the best.

    Jaworski labeled Cassel the worst starter in the NFL.

    “My 32nd rated quarterback entering the 2014 season is Matt Cassel,” Jaworski said on ESPN.

    According to Jaworski, Cassel isn’t well suited to new Vikings offensive coordinator Norv Turner’s system because Turner needs a quarterback who effectively uses play-action passes, and Cassel doesn’t.

    “Turner’s offense starts with the run game. With Adrian Peterson in the backfield, Cassel’s 66 quarterback rating last year on play-action passes just wasn’t good enough,” Jaworski said.

    Jaworski hasn’t always been so down on Cassel; in 2008, when Cassel was filling in forTom Brady as the Patriots’ starting quarterback, Jaworski praised Cassel as a “sure thing” and told NFL general managers they’d be wise to trade a first-round draft pick to acquire Cassel from New England. (The Chiefs ended up trading a second-round pick for Cassel.) But Jaworski is down on Cassel now.

    The good news for the Vikings is that even if Jaworski is right, Cassel won’t be the starter in Minnesota for long. It’s just a matter of time before he loses the job to Teddy Bridgewater.
     
  2. LesBaker

    Mr. Savant
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2012
    Messages:
    10,013
    Likes Received:
    7,374
    Gender:
    Male
    What's up with this........how did he miss tabbing Bradford for 32nd? :cautious:
     
    Stranger, DaveFan'51 and mr.stlouis like this.
  3. mr.stlouis

    Hall of Fame
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    6,454
    Likes Received:
    3,430
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Diesel Engine Dissassembly
    Location:
    Morrisville, Missouri
    Yeah, this is just weird. Lol
     
  4. TheDYVKX

    I miss Wang
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2014
    Messages:
    4,163
    Likes Received:
    5,545
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    David Wang
    Location:
    David Wang
    Right? I'm surprised. Sam is probably coming up in the next couple though, knowing Jaworski.

    I know those idiots over at the Post-Dispatch boards would trade Bradford and first round picks for Cassel any day.
     
  5. PrometheusFaulk

    Starter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 25, 2013
    Messages:
    618
    Likes Received:
    278
    I think Jaworski is talented at analyzing quarterbacks' strengths and weaknesses. But I also think he is leading the charge of the talking head mantra of "quarterback being the most important position" to such a substantial degree that many casual fans' take is, "quarterback is the only important position" and giving that viewpoint legitimacy in their eyes.

    And so I kinda hate him.

    Is that wrong?
     
  6. Barrison

    Hall of Fame
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,922
    Likes Received:
    1,140
    Occupation:
    Student, MPCC
    Trolling at its finest
     
  7. SierraRam

    Recreational User
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2014
    Messages:
    1,771
    Likes Received:
    2,881
    Occupation:
    Test Primate
    Location:
    Grass Valley, CA
    He'll also be the starting QB with the shortest tenure after he's buried under Mt. Rush More in week 1.

    [​IMG][​IMG] upload_2014-7-14_17-54-4.jpeg [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

    LetsGoRams, Alan, Mojo Ram and 8 others like this.
  8. LACHAMP46

    A snazzy title
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    5,396
    Likes Received:
    5,961
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Garden Grove, Ca.,
    Not only is QB reliant on players, Cassel shows you need coaching/scheme/feel for the player.....Belichek obviously knew how to use him.
     
    A55VA6 and SierraRam like this.
  9. den-the-coach

    Fifty-four Forty or Fight
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2013
    Messages:
    6,562
    Likes Received:
    8,807
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Training Director
    Location:
    Upstate New York
    I can understand the analysis, however, he's just holding it until Bridgewater is ready and they're not going start Teddy on the road against the Rams defensive line. Mike Zimmer is not that stupid, Rich Brooks was, but Zimmer isn't. Cassel will be replaced by the 3rd or 4th game depending on their record.
     
    VARam likes this.
  10. Boffo97

    Still legal in 17 states!
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2014
    Messages:
    5,279
    Likes Received:
    3,760
    Gender:
    Male
    They've likely convinced themselves that they'd be a better QB than Sam.
     
    TheDYVKX likes this.
  11. kurtfaulk

    Hall of Fame
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    4,112
    Likes Received:
    3,477
    .

    I wonder where he will rank krapondick. He had him in the hall last season. and rg3-10.

    .
     
    Philly5 likes this.
  12. jap

    jap
    Hall of Fame
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    3,941
    Likes Received:
    2,342
    I love the Mt. Rush More label. :sneaky::ROFLMAO:
     
  13. Barrison

    Hall of Fame
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,922
    Likes Received:
    1,140
    Occupation:
    Student, MPCC
    You got my vote for the name for our DL!
     
  14. RamWoodie

    Hall of Fame
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2014
    Messages:
    1,542
    Likes Received:
    1,049
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    This is "point on"...Jaworski is a fair analyst of QBs. I like the point he makes too because a good QBs confidence can be ruined in a system that doesn't suit his attributes. We've seen QBs go down the drain because they were not in a system suited to what they do best.
     
  15. PrometheusFaulk

    Starter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 25, 2013
    Messages:
    618
    Likes Received:
    278
    My opinion on the topic of positional importance is that no position is inherently the most important.

    A.) If you are to take a player, no matter how great, and put him with teammates that are bad enough or don't suit his skill sets, that team will not do well. An individual player can maximize his teammates' abilities, but at the end of the day if those abilities while maximized are still subpar, no one is making chicken salad out of chicken crap.

    B.) If you put one player who is bad enough at any position, regardless of how great the supporting cast is, that player's weaknesses will be exposed by the opposing units, and drag down the performance of the entire unit he plays on.

    If you believe as I do that A and B are true, how can it be said one position is "the most important?"

    That's my main issue with the comment, "quarterbacks are the most important player on the field." Jaworski hedges on his opinion at times by saying that quarterbacks can't function well in the wrong system or with the wrong teammates, to me that outlook says, "he's still the most important, he just needs good accessories." IMO, teammates are not accessories to the quarterback. They are all differently functioning cogs towards a team goal with the same level of importance.
     
    rhinobean, Prime Time and blue4 like this.
  16. DaveFan'51

    Old-Timer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2014
    Messages:
    9,825
    Likes Received:
    10,951
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired/Ram Fan
    Location:
    Simi Valley, Calif.
    This gave me an idea for a " Poll " How many QB's will be carried off the field this year after meeting-up with our D!
     
    RamzFanz and SierraRam like this.
  17. -X-

    -X-
    The Retired RODfather
    Staff
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    27,277
    Likes Received:
    28,820
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Elevator Inspector
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Because he's 33rd.
     
    LesBaker likes this.
  18. So Ram

    Starter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2014
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    234
    Gender:
    Male
    Will see what happens this year ----.Kap is getting paid well this year.Will see how that effect the 9ers.
    A Super Bowl & a NFC Championship would be nice.The worst thing about Kap us he still has upside.
    I think Bradford is a top 20 QB with a lot of upside.The no huddle is where Sam will thrive.He will be playing for a contract.
     
  19. Philly5

    Rookie
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    345
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New Jersey, USA
    Doing what Jaws does shouldn't be a 12 month a year gig. In the down time he spends too much energy trying for sensational headlines. Hurts his credibility. Thinking Krapendork was the best QB ever last year was crazy. Break down film for us when games are going on. Leave the silly lists and garbage for Bleacher Reports.
     
    brokeu91 likes this.
  20. flv

    flv
    
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    Messages:
    6,144
    Likes Received:
    4,155
    Occupation:
    No. Britain is free from occupation.
    Location:
    Bournemouth, UK
    That line of argument would suggest that no position was least important because all postions were of equal importance. I agree with A). I agree with B). Where I think your argument fails is that there aren't any players in the NFL that are so bad that a team can't win just because their weakest player plays. Teams are more likely to win with a great QB and a weak LT than they are with a weak QB and a great LT. Thus QB is more important than LT.
     
    AZfan93 likes this.