Hekker / trade block / Renegotiated

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RhodyRams

well hung member
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Moderator
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
11,844
Raise your hand if you knew exactly how this we would play out.......


Ill wait . .but calling bullshit on first one to chime in with hand raised
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,774
I didn't know how it'd play out, but I did say his contract was too big of a problem.

Jourdan said he was quote "untradable" with that contract.

So saying him with his contract was a negative was spot on. Cough @jrry32 cough
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
23,210
Raise your hand if you knew exactly how this we would play out.......


Ill wait . .but calling bullshit on first one to chime in with hand raised
Lol. I was going to give you a high five and then realized it would look like I was raising my hand....
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
34,043
Name
Stu
A roster spot needing to be cleared so the renegotiation can happen is actually a snag btw.
But we already knew that, so not a snag or anything suggesting the renegotiation was at risk of being nullified.
 

ArkyRamsFan

Pro Bowler
Joined
Apr 6, 2016
Messages
1,869
Raise your hand if you knew exactly how this we would play out.......


Ill wait . .but calling bullshit on first one to chime in with hand raised
I'll tell you what happened. I posted a thread on how Bojo's bombastic punting last Saturday was a DIRECT result of kicking in the thin air of Denver.
I also included info on how there's much more to punting than gross yards. One must consider things like ball placement and hang time.
Ain't a doubt in my mind that McSnead studied my thread/post intensely and immediately decided to keep Hekk and trade Bojo.
Y'all can thank me later.

~ArkyRamsFan~
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,833
I didn't know how it'd play out, but I did say his contract was too big of a problem.

Jourdan said he was quote "untradable" with that contract.

So saying him with his contract was a negative was spot on. Cough @jrry32 cough
LOL. We kept that contract. So the only team that matters clearly didn't feel like Hekker, with his contract, is a net negative. :ROFLMAO:
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,774
LOL. We kept that contract. So the only team that matters clearly didn't feel like Hekker, with his contract, is a net negative. :ROFLMAO:


I mean, we forced him to renegotiate it.

Used Corey as leverage to force him to do it - and it sounds like if he would have said no, we would have moved on. No Rams sources confirmed that, but Jourdan is pretty in the know.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,833
I mean, we forced him to renegotiate it.

Used Corey as leverage to force him to do it - and it sounds like if he would have said no, we would have moved on. No Rams sources confirmed that, but Jourdan is pretty in the know.
We'll see what the details are, but unless he took an absolutely massive pay cut, the Rams could have saved a lot more money by keeping Bojorquez.
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
11,396
It was such nonsense that he was essentially forced to take a pay cut or get cut.

So yeah, it was 50/50. Had he said no, be would be gone
Now that’s the wonderful thing about turning a negative into a positive isn’t it?
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,774
We'll see what the details are, but unless he took an absolutely massive pay cut, the Rams could have saved a lot more money by keeping Bojorquez.


I think we wouldnt have saved much at all by cutting him - keeping Bojorquez would have resulted in paying the punter spot the same regardless of who we kept this year.

Since no one wanted to trade for him, the only way we save any money toward the P spot was if Hekker took a pay cut - so even if he just took a little off, saved us more money for this year than any other alternative.
 

jap

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,560
I mean, we forced him to renegotiate it.

Used Corey as leverage to force him to do it - and it sounds like if he would have said no, we would have moved on. No Rams sources confirmed that, but Jourdan is pretty in the know.
Wasn't the renegotiation labelled a "restructuring?" If so then that would involve reshuffling the money, but Johnny should not have lost anything over the life of the contract.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
23,210
Wasn't the renegotiation labelled a "restructuring?" If so then that would involve reshuffling the money, but Johnny should not have lost anything over the life of the contract.
He already restructured once before thus incurring a dead cap hit of near 1.2 mill this season, 700k next season, 400k the season after. If they convert a large portion of his 3.75 mill to a bonus they can lower his 2021 number, but create a bigger issue next year and thereafter when his salaries hit 4 mill +
His salary number isnt guaranteed so they can basically tear up his contract and sign a new one that pays him his money now and keeps cap in line
Like a new 6 year 20 mill deal with only 5-6 mill guaranteed
2-3 mill signing bonus guaranteed
2022 + 2023 roster bonus guaranteed 500k
Base salary of 1.75 mill only guaranteed for 2021/2022
So he gets his money for this year and next but the CAP hit is much more in line
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,833
I think we wouldnt have saved much at all by cutting him - keeping Bojorquez would have resulted in paying the punter spot the same regardless of who we kept this year.

Since no one wanted to trade for him, the only way we save any money toward the P spot was if Hekker took a pay cut - so even if he just took a little off, saved us more money for this year than any other alternative.
We would have saved $3.75M this year by cutting him. And we weren't paying Bojorquez anywhere close to $3.75M.
 

Malibu

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
1,396
I feel Bojo should have been the Punter. I love Hekket but to me Bojo was better and way less expensive.
 

wolfdogg

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,965
Name
wolfdogg
So i guess this will be the first time in rams history that we will follow another team's punter so we can argue about whether it was a mistake to let that punter go.
 

Psycho_X

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
11,269
So i guess this will be the first time in rams history that we will follow another team's punter so we can argue about whether it was a mistake to let that punter go.
Yeah, can't wait for the game time thread when we play Green Bay... "Bojrquez had 1.2 more yard average per punt!!!! F&@# YOU SNEAD!!!!!!!!!"
 

wolfdogg

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,965
Name
wolfdogg
Yeah, can't wait for the game time thread when we play Green Bay... "Bojrquez had 1.2 more yard average per punt!!!! F&@# YOU SNEAD!!!!!!!!!"

You know hekker will have this as the only circled game in 10 years. If the announcers are good they will play this up
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,774
We would have saved $3.75M this year by cutting him. And we weren't paying Bojorquez anywhere close to $3.75M.


I don't have time to look it up, but I thought someone countered my argument to cut him with the fact that we wouldn't actually save that much this season. But admittedly I didn't check.

Will be interesting to see what he lowered the number too since the Rams seemed to agree he was overpaid
 

Riverumbbq

Angry Progressive
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
11,962
Name
River
I don't have time to look it up, but I thought someone countered my argument to cut him with the fact that we wouldn't actually save that much this season. But admittedly I didn't check.

Will be interesting to see what he lowered the number too since the Rams seemed to agree he was overpaid

Bojorquez will carry over his $1,020,000. CAP hit to Green Bay.