- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 39,159
Never heard that form McVay where'd you get this? He doesn't say that in his presser yesterday or any of the others this week.Pretty sure McVay left it up to Todd if he wanted to play
Think about that...
So that means we're speculating that TG just doesn't have the heart to play? Or he's not playing because he doesn't like his role in the offense or lack of carries now? He's really not hurt he just doesn't want to play? That's what I see from some responses, just curious what the deal is.Of course you know Senor Old School
I’d prefer to be a pontificating ass...and TG, two...maybe 3 weeks down the road somehow remembers he’s only 26 years old
Not the Nancy type, but good gawd something just ain’t right here
So that means we're speculating that TG just doesn't have the heart to play? Or he's not playing because he doesn't like his role in the offense or lack of carries now? He's really not hurt he just doesn't want to play? That's what I see from some responses, just curious what the deal is.
Never heard that form McVay where'd you get this? He doesn't say that in his presser yesterday or any of the others this week.
View: https://www.facebook.com/Rams/videos/959177707768028/
I don’t know how to post links, but there is an article from the Sporting News (from about 12 hours ago) that talks about how McVay was going to let Gurley decide whether or not he plays tomorrow, depending on he feels. Article is titled...
“Rams Sean McVay says it’s up to Todd Gurley if he wants to play vs. 49ers”
That makes two of us my manI don’t know how to post links, but there is an article from the Sporting News (from about 12 hours ago) that talks about how McVay was going to let Gurley decide whether or not he plays tomorrow, depending on he feels. Article is titled...
“Rams Sean McVay says it’s up to Todd Gurley if he wants to play vs. 49ers”
I don’t know how to post links, but there is an article from the Sporting News (from about 12 hours ago) that talks about how McVay was going to let Gurley decide whether or not he plays tomorrow, depending on he feels. Article is titled...
“Rams Sean McVay says it’s up to Todd Gurley if he wants to play vs. 49ers”
"He knows his body as well as anybody," McVay said. "I think we all know what a tough, elite competitor he's been in terms of the things that he's been able to push through. So really it's about that collaboration, that communication and then making sure we do, number one, what's best for him. And he'll always be able to communicate that honestly with us."
I don’t know how to post links, but there is an article from the Sporting News (from about 12 hours ago) that talks about how McVay was going to let Gurley decide whether or not he plays tomorrow, depending on he feels. Article is titled...
“Rams Sean McVay says it’s up to Todd Gurley if he wants to play vs. 49ers”
Difficulty worded my man, allow me my best takes
TG isn’t a how many touches guy... nope TG is all about the W (annnd we all KNOW that)
Heart to play?
I “gots”to say
Bingo
Please dear God tell me I’m wrong but after that drag down vs KC, he’s just never been the same
My opinion of course
So an SI reporter says this but nobody who covers the team says it and it wasn't in any of his pressers this week? Got it sorry not buying it until I hear McVay say that. And even then I'm not dumping on TG.I don’t know how to post links, but there is an article from the Sporting News (from about 12 hours ago) that talks about how McVay was going to let Gurley decide whether or not he plays tomorrow, depending on he feels. Article is titled...
“Rams Sean McVay says it’s up to Todd Gurley if he wants to play vs. 49ers”
A huge stretch at no time in that presser does McVay even hint at it's up to TG. Much ado about nothing from the media.Rams' Sean McVay says it's up to Todd Gurley if he wants to play vs. 49ers | Sporting News
The Ram's running back was listed as doubtful on the team's injury report on Friday.www.sportingnews.com
Boiling that down to "it's up to Todd if he wants to play" is kind of a stretch, no?