1. To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Found this---"From the Insider"

Discussion in 'RAMS - NFL TALK' started by sdakotaram, Apr 10, 2014.

  1. sdakotaram

    sdakotaram New Member

    Messages:
    72
    Credit:
    $107,442.09
    Name:
    sdakotaram
    Not sure how much is real but I found it interesting

    http://www.ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?5,472497,472497#msg-472497

    Hey everyone,

    As I think I mentioned previously, the top two players on their board, regardless of position, are Clowney and Mack. Clowney is rated higher, but there is an interesting debate going on, and that is based upon their 4-3 scheme and the personnel we have, who would see the field more? Take special teams out of the equation for now.

    - The case for Clowney is that they rotate their DE's a fair amount already, and on clear passing downs they would put Quinn and Clowney at DE (although both currently play RDE) and have Hayes and Long inside (Long does this on certain sets now, he is a team guy, and he and Hayes are good against the run in case the opponent checks to a run). And although Hayes and Sims are good players, they are both at the end of their deals after this year (or cutt-able with minimal cap ramifications). So at the end of Clowney's first year, they would likely be gone, and Long will be 30/31 yrs old.

    - The case for Mack is that on running downs he would play the SAM. Although they re-signed Dunbar for this role, its was not a huge dollar deal, and they have minimal depth at LB anyway, so the Rams don't look at this as an issue. On passing downs they could do the above and have Mack rushing from the DE instead of Clowney. In the future, there are those in the organization than think that Mack could be moved inside to the middle backer spot, particularly on passing downs, as he and Ogletree have the most speed/upside in coverage as opposed to Laurinaitis.

    As always, I'm just passing along information as I get it, and I thought this debate was interesting. You could make the "playing time" case for either player, but it arguably slants towards Mack. As I've said, their first inclination is to trade down. But this is more complicated as it will be an "on the clock" decision based upon who goes number 1. So knowing that, you have to plan for the contingency of if you don't get an offer you like, or you don't want to trade down that far, etc. So the first thing they need to decide on is who they would take at #2 if they stood pat. If they stayed true to their board, its Clowney or Mack, hence the debate above. Or Fisher could overrule and go with the guy he wants to get one way or another, which is Matthews.
  2. Alan

    Alan Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,861
    Credit:
    $2,208,710.59
    Rated by who? Debated by who?
  3. NJRamsFan

    NJRamsFan Cocaine Cowboy

    Messages:
    1,263
    Credit:
    $928,153.10
    I really like Mack as a player I just don't think he's a good scheme fit
    Rambitious1, V3, tbux and 1 other person like this.
  4. sdakotaram

    sdakotaram New Member

    Messages:
    72
    Credit:
    $107,442.09
    Name:
    sdakotaram
    Just a thought....Say we draft Mack/Clowney. How much would it cost to move up to say 4/5 to draft Matthews??
  5. NJRamsFan

    NJRamsFan Cocaine Cowboy

    Messages:
    1,263
    Credit:
    $928,153.10
    From 13? I don't know the exact value but I would think at least a first rounder +
  6. BonifayRam

    BonifayRam Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,319
    Credit:
    $4,020,457.01
    Name:
    Vernon
    Both Fisher & Williams have a history of using Nickle & Dime defenses regular and often. They prefer these DB heavy defenses. Fisher as a Ram HC in 2012 played more Nickle than base. One might argue that in 2013 he may have repeated that but the Nickle DB Finnegan & then McLeod was not up to the job. Fisher also likes using the four DE's in his Nickle & Dimes. Not sure what the new DC will do but Our DL is full of talent who can rush the QB not sure if OSLB'er Mack would fit in the Nickle & Dimes.

    Even though some say he is good and other say that Mack's coverage skills is not on par with his others. That he lacks what you would want in range in coverages. Mack is NOT fluid in his drops. An where Alec Ogletree is a very good tackler in space Mack is noted for not being the most consistent tackler in space .
    DR RAM likes this.
  7. Stranger

    Stranger How big is infinity?

    Messages:
    4,776
    Credit:
    $1,625,512.70
    Name:
    Hugh
    I've been thinking the same thing.... move up from #13, but in my case I'm hoping it's to grab Watkins.
    tbux and NJRamsFan like this.
  8. UnknownREknown

    UnknownREknown Well-unKnown Member

    Messages:
    215
    Credit:
    $1,125,436.81
    I'm really starting to think just grab Clowney, if he's not there then push for a trade down. I like Mack but I think Snead can make something happen with the #2 pick.
    CGI_Ram likes this.
  9. NJRamsFan

    NJRamsFan Cocaine Cowboy

    Messages:
    1,263
    Credit:
    $928,153.10
    agree
  10. FRO

    FRO Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,161
    Credit:
    $3,009,054.92
    I would pick Clowney over Mack. He is bigger and more athletic. I hope he is the pick at 2.
    Memento and Memphis Ram like this.
  11. tbux

    tbux Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    349
    Credit:
    $1,258,007.12
    Trade down- take Watkins- use those picks to trade back up and take Matthews/Robinson- perfect start and possible!
    Rambitious1 likes this.
  12. Yamahopper

    Yamahopper Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,063
    Credit:
    $1,226,128.63
    I give Mack about 1% chance to be a Ram unless a trade down goes horribly wrong or he somehow falls and is available at 13, but doubtful even then.
    BUT if the Rams do pick him he's not coming off the field very often. Sam and his hand in the dirt, Williams mans up and brings the pain. Mack would bring the pain.
    Everyone is worried about his coverage skills. He's replacing Dunbar, how can he be worse? He's faster than Ogletree, not as fast as Clowney though which is scary in it's self. He's a scheme fit as in like Clowney the scheme will adapt to what he can do well. When you take a elite prospect it's not all about how he fits, some of it is what he can add to the scheme.
    Elmgrovegnome likes this.
  13. Memphis Ram

    Memphis Ram Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,396
    Credit:
    $3,694,530.71
    The scheme the team ran last year or the scheme Gregg Williams was running in Washington?

    If the later, I'd say he's a perfect fit in a Marcus Washington type role.
  14. NJRamsFan

    NJRamsFan Cocaine Cowboy

    Messages:
    1,263
    Credit:
    $928,153.10
    I was referring to the scheme we ran last year. I think Williams will spice things up a bit but the overall integrity of the D will be similar IMO
  15. Ramhusker

    Ramhusker Well-Known Member Pick 'Em Champion Pit Boss

    Messages:
    3,819
    Credit:
    $1,649,637.49
    Lord, this draft cannot get here fast enough!
  16. mr.stlouis

    mr.stlouis Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,641
    Credit:
    $5,255,863.27
    Name:
    Nick
    It's a big reason I beleive we go secondary with our #13 pick, barring trade.
  17. RaminExile

    RaminExile Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    468
    Credit:
    $13,165.46
    I want them both! And Matthews!

    Take Clowney at 2. Trade up to 3. Take Mack. Trade up to 4. Take Jake Matthews. Have no more picks for the next two years. Lose every game because we dont have a secondary....
  18. fearsomefour

    fearsomefour Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,234
    Credit:
    $3,690,834.58
    5 DBS, Long, Brockers, Hayes, Quinn, Ogletree, Clowney....there is a scary nickel package.
    Ogletree or Clowney could drop in coverage, play over the TE or blitz.
  19. RamzFanz

    RamzFanz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,177
    Credit:
    $3,863,565.71
    This is complete BS.

    "on clear passing downs they would put Quinn and Clowney at DE"

    That makes no sense. Clowney may end up being a far better run defender than pass rusher. He's excellent. He has speed and very good tackling techniques. He was very very good at run defense in college.

    There is no way Mack is #2 on the board. With Watkins, Robinson, and Mathews? No way.
  20. Barrison

    Barrison Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,330
    Credit:
    $2,732,068.94
    Name:
    Barry
    I liked how he stated that it is public knowledge that Matthews is Fishers favorite and could overrule Snead for the pick, but this is info some random internet poster named db knows... right. o_O
    RamzFanz likes this.