The thread was for the complainers that act like they had a better draft plan... Apparently they have all come to their senses now so this thread is basically obsolete... I expect no more complaining unless they can fill in all the blanks
It comes off to me as those that put in the work, the draftniks and arm chair GM's who make the draft a hobby, need acknowledgement for thier work if there are to be any disagreements.To those that put in the work, I appreciate the knowledge dropped.
I can dislike our draft and not have a better plan. However, its not working for me if someone says "okay you dont like pic #37, who would you have picked?" ...and I say this because its not necessarily any one pick I may have an issue with, but rather a direction or the whole draft in general.
The consesus is ok with me as well. If 70% of the writers, draftnicks, even Mel Kiper, believe one way, then to me that is the right way until those 70% are wrong. Which is entirely possible. (Jason Smith for example)
Any differences of opinion are easily covered by the "thats what the team board says" argument or the "thats what the coach wanted" retort. So its not really a winnable argument either way, its just differences of opinion.
Is it really fair to label those who did not like the draft as "complainers?"