Does Sean Need OC Help?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CoachAllred

Hall of Fame
Joined
Dec 23, 2019
Messages
2,155
Sean McVay and the Rams need to re-hire a full-time offensive coordinator

Rich Hammond



1577731847285.png


Calif. — Even one of history’s greatest bands couldn’t get by without a little help from its friends. So there’s no shame in scrolling through your list of contacts, Sean McVay.

The Rams need an offensive coordinator. A full-time, full-fledged one. Not a run-game coordinator or a pass-game coordinator or whatever role that an “assistant coordinator/offense” fills. McVay can, and should, retain offensive play-calling duties in 2020, but he needs another voice — and a strong one.

McVay, the Rams’ offensive architect and play-caller, hasn’t employed a traditional coordinator since Matt LaFleur left almost two years ago. Over the past 12 months, it’s become increasingly clear that McVay could benefit from a little more help from a staffer who isn’t also a position coach, someone who can watch the game with more of a calm detachment and gently guide McVay in the right direction.

The Rams’ regression on offense this season — and, more notably, the lack of a consistent identity — make it clear that something needs to change. Is McVay prepared to make a proactive move?

“You’re always evaluating,” McVay said this week. “The one thing, for myself in this role, is you’re constantly evaluating all the elements that this role entails. You always want to continue to do it at a high level. The way you do get better is, you surround yourself with people that are better than you.”

Precisely. And that’s why someone — ideally a veteran coach — needs to be in McVay’s ear, not only during early-week strategy planning but also at halftime, or even in the middle of the first quarter, when in-game adjustments are imperative. McVay and the Rams aren’t far off here — this isn’t a disastrous offense, even though things sometimes look grim — but a little help can go a long way.

McVay is one of only three NFL head coaches who does not employ an offensive coordinator. That’s not necessarily a red flag. The other two are McVay’s fellow young-gun NFC West coaches, San Francisco’s Kyle Shanahan and Arizona’s Kliff Kingsbury, and the 49ers are enjoying a fantastic offensive season.

But the Rams are not. Independent of personnel issues — and there have been many — the offense has been inconsistent and slow to adjust. Opposing defenses, tired of getting steamrolled in 2017 and 2018, have flooded the Rams’ offense with different looks than they show on film and with multiple looks within games.

It’s lazy and inaccurate to say McVay has been “figured out.” Coaching requires constant adjustments, from season to season, week to week and even series to series. That’s not easy, and McVay has a lot on his plate. It’s not a failure to admit that he could benefit from some assistance.

For evidence, look no further than last Sunday’s dismal 44-21 loss at Dallas. The Rams’ first drive — which often is scripted before the game — was solid, with a mix of runs and play-action passes. The Rams ultimately punted from midfield but looked to have established some momentum. From there, though, they increasingly went away from the run and the types of roll-out plays that had helped quarterback Jared Goff get into a rhythm in previous games.

The Rams became more predictable and one-dimensional on offense. Todd Gurley had one rushing yard at halftime. (It’s also fair to re-raise the question of Gurley’s health status and how much McVay truly can use him, given that Gurley does not look dynamic even when he is fed the ball.)

Beyond all that, the point here is not to ridicule McVay, paint him as a bad coach or blame him entirely — or even primarily — for the Rams’ underachievement. In fact, there have been some clear positives.

At the start of this season, McVay got handed an offense that included a revamped, unproven offensive line and a running back with some type of load-management plan. More recently, McVay also engineered excellent plans for games against Chicago and Seattle and has been unwavering as a leader.

None of those things should be ignored. McVay’s offensive mind is sharp. He doesn’t turn 34 until next month, so it’s natural that there would be some growing pains in his head-coaching career. Everything remains in place for McVay to turn this around, assuming the Rams make some smart personnel moves. Plus, it’s not a nightmare. The Rams rank in the top half of the league in both points and yards.

It’s clearly not the same, though. The Rams have exceeded 30 points in only three of 14 games this season, even though, with some notable exceptions, the defense is improved. In 2017 and 2018, the Rams topped 30 points in 21 of their 32 regular-season games. So what has changed?

After his hiring in 2017, McVay brought in LaFleur as his offensive coordinator, and the Rams led the NFL with an average of 29.9 points per game. LaFleur left to become the Tennessee Titans’ coordinator, with a chance to call plays, which was a good, understandable move that helped LaFleur get hired as Green Bay’s head coach a year later (the Packers sit atop the NFC North in his first season).

Instead of hiring a new coordinator, McVay named tight ends coach Shane Waldron as his pass-game coordinator and offensive line coach Aaron Kromer as his run-game coordinator. By all accounts, things worked fine, as the Rams in 2018 totaled more points and yards than they did with LaFleur.

There were warning signs, though, particularly late in the season and in the Super Bowl, when opposing defenses enjoyed increasing success against the Rams. McVay stayed with his staff and elevated Jedd Fisch, who had assisted McVay with timeouts and clock management, to “assistant coordinator/offense.”

Early in the 2019 season, teams continued to give the Rams new and varied defensive looks. The Rams have been slow to adjust, and it’s hard to see how that isn’t complicated by the fact that McVay takes such ownership of the offense while also managing all other aspects of the team.

Yes, Kromer, Waldron and Fisch help, but they also have other responsibilities. It isn’t ridiculous to think the Rams would benefit from adding someone to assist offensive overview beyond Fisch’s analysis. Plus, Fisch might be on the move, as Bruce Feldman of The Athletic recently mentioned him as a candidate for the Florida Atlantic job.

“We’ve got a lot of good people here,” McVay said, “but I think it’s always continuing to find that good balance of, what does it look like structurally — really, for our organization in terms of that setup — and we want to be able to get the best people here. I think you’re always looking at those things, but I feel really good about what our group has done, if you’re asking about that.”

No, that’s not it. Kromer, Waldron and Fisch are not bad coaches. The suggestion is that they could be supplemented, not replaced. If 29 teams have a full-time coordinator, why can’t the Rams?

For some interesting perspective, McVay need only turn to his defensive coordinator.

Wade Phillips had three stints as an NFL head coach. In Denver in 1993-94, he employed Charlie Waters as defensive coordinator. In Buffalo from 1998 to 2000, he had Ted Cottrell. In 2007, when Phillips got hired in Dallas, he hired then-San Diego Chargers defensive backs coach Brian Stewart as his coordinator. Phillips, one of the great defensive minds in league history, clearly still ran the unit, but he had help.

The Cowboys fired Stewart after Phillips’ second season and did not replace him. Phillips ran the defense himself in 2009, and it thrived as Dallas allowed the second-fewest points in the league. But it didn’t last. In 2010, the Cowboys allowed an average of 29.0 points in their first eight games. Phillips got fired.

“I thought it was the right thing to do at the time. We did it,” Phillips said. “You’re involved on your side of the ball, no matter what. I mean, with Charlie and Ted and those guys, you set the game plan together and that kind of thing. You’re more involved on your side of the ball.”

Every situation is different, but McVay is very much in the minority when it comes to going it alone.

Of the 15 current head coaches who previously worked as an NFL offensive coordinator, only McVay and Shanahan do not have an offensive coordinator. Of the 15 current head coaches who call their team’s plays — it’s a different list — only McVay, Kingsbury and Shanahan do not have a coordinator.

Even the league’s most-veteran, play-calling coaches — such as Oakland’s Jon Gruden, New Orleans’ Asshole Face and Kansas City’s Andy Reid — have coordinators under them.

Minnesota recently took it a step further. Coach Mike Zimmer made staff changes after last season and not only promoted Kevin Stefanski to full-time offensive coordinator but also hired veteran coach Gary Kubiak as “assistant head coach and offensive advisor.” The Vikings are scoring an average of 4.5 points per game more than they did last season and have a top-five scoring offense.

There is always the risk of having too many cooks in the kitchen, or coaches in the office in this case. For that reason, McVay should remain the unquestioned leader of the offense and should retain play-calling duties. He enjoys doing that and, for most of his Rams tenure, he’s been good at it. He just might benefit from a little help, and McVay sounded open to anything, even the suggestion that he might one day hand off those play-calling duties.

“If I felt like there was a setup where we would be a better football team if that wasn’t the case, and it enables you to do some other things, I would never say never,” McVay said, “but those are always things you evaluate.

“Right now our focus is on the 49ers, doing a great job, and then when the offseason hits, whenever that is, there will be some time for us to really be able to look inward and figure out what’s going to be the best thing for the Rams moving forward.”


*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Really agree McVay could use some help. It's very easy to get tunnel vision when calling plays. Having a second set of eyes that focus solely on the overall aspect of game flow,would IMHO be a huge help.

Just someone to say from time to time,during the game. What about this or hey we need to get back to that. Someone McVay could trust and use as use as a sound board.

Thoughts??
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,754
YES.

He also needs someone who will say "Sean I think that's a bad idea". Basically a Wade Phillips for the offense.
 

PressureD41

Les Snead's Draft Advisor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
3,806
Name
Eddy
agreed on adding a second pair of eyes
 

SierraRam

Recreational User
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
2,254
There's nothing wrong that a solid, consistent offensive line won't fix.

But having another guy he respects to share the play calling responsibility is not a bad idea... The poor kid looked like he definitely could use a day off more than once this season

Image result for sean mcvay stressed
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
29,698
If we had a stable Oline this last year, this wouldn't be much of an issue, imo.
 

Riverumbbq

Angry Progressive
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
11,962
Name
River
There's nothing wrong that a solid, consistent offensive line won't fix.

But having another guy he respects to share the play calling responsibility is not a bad idea... The poor kid looked like he definitely could use a day off more than once this season

Image result for sean mcvay stressed

Agree with this.

A couple games I wondered whether they had been game planned at all. He's a young guy, about to be married, and already with a huge plate on his table. Keeping your young girlfriend happy while grounding out hours as an NFL Head Coach can't be an easy task, there have to be frustrations mounting. Sharing some duties can not only benefit the team, but also his mental health in the long run. I'd rather not see him burn-out by micromanaging this offense, being a good manager requires delegating duties to trusted competent colleagues. jmo.
 

BC Ramfan

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 18, 2018
Messages
157
Name
BC Ramfan
Yes.
To my eye SF looks considerably more creative on O than the Rams (defensively too, but that's a different story).
Not dogging on McVay. He's really smart and knowledgeable.
But it's a lot on your plate just to be a Head Coach.
IMO it would be good to have some more brainpower re play design, play calling, and adjustments.

BC
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
Yes.
To my eye SF looks considerably more creative on O than the Rams (defensively too, but that's a different story).
Not dogging on McVay. He's really smart and knowledgeable.
But it's a lot on your plate just to be a Head Coach.
IMO it would be good to have some more brainpower re play design, play calling, and adjustments.

BC

I'll say this about the difference on O between the Rams and 49ers.

This year the 49ers were very balanced and JG knows how to get the ball out quickly AND his mechanics are solid. Especially his footwork. The Rams on the other hand weren't balanced and Goff struggled behind the OL.

I don't think Shanahan is more creative, but he is WAY more experienced (especially at higher up positions on staffs) and more mature than McVay. Shanahan has that going for him.

Shanahan's first stint at OC was 2008. McVay's first was 2014. In 6 years a coach at that level learns an awful lot. McVay will get there.

This season probably changes McVay. Sometimes experience teaches you things you DIDN'T want to know. Like the fact that losing is not fun.
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
29,698
That we need a better Oline? Damn straight!
 

HellRam

Starter
Joined
May 9, 2016
Messages
675
If we had a stable Oline this last year, this wouldn't be much of an issue, imo.


Personally I think everyone is blaming the oline too much. Obviously it's not a very good unit. However it seems everyone has already forgotten how we fisnished last year with a above average oline. The Rams were still stumped by the Lions, Bears, Eagles and Patriots in the big game.

This offense has more issues then just the line in my opinion. I would have no problem with the Rams bringing someone in.
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
29,698
Personally I think everyone is blaming the oline too much. Obviously it's not a very good unit. However it seems everyone has already forgotten how we fisnished last year with a above average oline. The Rams were still stumped by the Lions, Bears, Eagles and Patriots in the big game.

This offense has more issues then just the line in my opinion. I would have no problem with the Rams bringing someone.
It's not been emphasized enough, imo. You have Whit aging another year, lose Saffold and Sully and replace them with rookies or 1st year guys, and some of them go down. For good or bad, Goff's internal clock before sensing danger was way out of whack in the first half of the season due to 2017. Now we looked much better in the last few games on the Oline, but by then it was too late. Stable Oline = McVay success imo./Rams success
 

HellRam

Starter
Joined
May 9, 2016
Messages
675
It's not been emphasized enough, imo. You have Whit aging another year, lose Saffold and Sully and replace them with rookies or 1st year guys, and some of them go down. For good or bad, Goff's internal clock before sensing danger was way out of whack in the first half of the season due to 2017. Now we looked much better in the last few games on the Oline, but by then it was too late. Stable Oline = McVay success imo./Rams success

I'll agree half way with you. Obviously any team would do better with a good oline. Still however the Rams were getting shut down at times with a good oline last year. Those 6 man fronts were effective against us even when we had Saffold and Co. McVay could evolve is offense more.
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
29,698
I'll agree half way with you. Obviously any team would do better with a good oline. Still however the Rams were getting shut down at times with a good oline last year. Those 6 man fronts were effective against us even when we had Saffold and Co. McVay could evolve is offense more.
The original statement was that people wouldn't be looking so hard at McVay's lack of an OC with a good stable Oline.
Stable Oline = More Wins = Playoffs = Less call for a new OC....
 

Riverumbbq

Angry Progressive
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
11,962
Name
River
I'll agree half way with you. Obviously any team would do better with a good oline. Still however the Rams were getting shut down at times with a good oline last year. Those 6 man fronts were effective against us even when we had Saffold and Co. McVay could evolve is offense more.

Yes, but last year Blythe & Sullivan were the specific OL problem, this year the break-down was even more wide-spread. Not saying that the OL is our only problem area this being a team game, but no other unit had this kind of inconsistency.
 

HellRam

Starter
Joined
May 9, 2016
Messages
675
Yes, but last year Blythe & Sullivan were the specific OL problem, this year the break-down was even more wide-spread. Not saying that the OL is our only problem area this being a team game, but no other unit had this kind of inconsistency.

Oline is definitely the weakest unit. No debate there. But last year oline was borderline a top 5 unit for the season. Good defenses have found a way to slow down if not completely shut down the Rams offense. We saw it multiple times this year( 49ers, Steelers, Cowboys). I'd be surprised if the Rams stand pat on offense in regards to offensive coaching. They were rumored to hire Kingsbuy in the past. I think McVay knows he needs to step up it a notch.
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
29,698
Oline is defending the weakest untit. No debate there. But last year oline was borderline a top 5 unit for the season. Good defenses have found a way to slow down if not completely shut down the Rams offense. We saw it multiple times this year( 49ers, Steelers, Cowboys). I'd be surprised if the Rams stand pat on offense in regards to offensive coaching. They were rumored to hire Kingsbuy in the past. I think McVay knows he needs to step up it a notch.
But don't you see the variables changed since last year? We saw it multiple times this year because our Oline sucked, not because of playcalling, necessarily. McVay did go to a more TE heavy offense, which looks good, but coincidentally, the mishmash Oline was performing well, simultaneously.