Of course not. I'm going based of what you typed. "I'll settle for less."
No, you're not. Here's my verbatim quote:
What more do I want? 4000+ yards, 30 TDs, and a 100 QB Rating. But I'd settle for less. I'm not, however, settling for less than a legitimate starting QB. Case ain't that.
Apparently, we're going to argue semantics since you seem intent on telling me what I'm willing to settle for based on my language. What we have here is explicit language that I'm not willing to settle for less than a legitimate starting QB. We also have me saying that I'll settle for less than 4000+ yards, 30 TDs, and a 100+ QB Rating. But again, that's qualified by me saying that I won't settle for less than a legitimate starting QB and Case ain't that.
You have my answer. Now, we can stop arguing in circles over whatever it is you were arguing. I can't even figure out what it is you've been trying to argue this entire time.
You get the stuff on NFL.com rewind and highlights. I'm pretty sure teams have more resources.You don't.
I get my stuff on NFL Rewind. Which has every snap of every game. Unless Chase Daniel is playing secret games, I'm pretty sure the teams don't have game film that I don't have. At least, not relevant game film. I mean if we want to go back years and years, yea, they have that. But I have everything that they have over the past few years in terms of game footage.
Anywho, even if you and teams have the same "film", it still isn't enough to have your boy a shot to start for a QB needy team.
When has he given a shot to compete for a starting job? Why didn't any NFL team try to get via a trade and let him compete to be a starter? He isn't going to start unless it's injury or mop-up time (as past history indicates).
Well, NFL teams make their own choices. You'd have to ask them why.
As a backup, fine. Most of us are simply saying there is no major difference b/w him and your boy. Both are backup QBs, yes you can "upgrade" but if you can't, Case can handle the job. As 2 teams have given him the chance to start for an extended period of time. IDK why it's so difficult for you.
There's enough of a difference for me to prefer Daniel.
Why bring it up in the 1st place then? You said the low passing attempts per game (as a another attempt to downgrade Case) was a "problem" in todays NFL. I refuted that by pointing out 8/12 playoff teams were ranked below that benchmark purpose.
No, I said the Rams only allowing Keenum to attempt 25 passes a game on average shows that they were taking the ball out of his hands. Considering the team with the least number of passing attempts in the NFL last year (Minnesota) averaged 28.4 per game, I'd say that my comment holds true.
Why did I bring up the Steelers? Because they were the median team. It's a statistical benchmark. They were 16th out of 32 teams. That makes them the exact middle of the pack.(although, technically the median would be 16.5 but I was being lazy) The point of that is showing how the average number of attempts they gave Keenum compared to a typical NFL team.
We got Case Keenum here. A guy that has played more than all those guys (except obviously RF) and MG only starting a whopping 3 more.
And that's the problem. I know what he is.
Why change something and go through ANOTHER QB when you got a guy that knows this team, knows this offense, and the team can patiently find this upgrade?
Because they're better players at the most important positions. This means they are upgrades. And I don't much feel like waiting years for this team to find a real franchise QB.
