Dieter the Brock
Fourth responder
- Joined
- May 18, 2014
- Messages
- 8,196
That implies that Goff would have won all the games the Rams lost, and nobody knows that. Further implies that Goff would have also won all the games the Rams won by not doing less than Keenum did. Nobody knows that either. We can all assume he would have, but that's all we can do based on our own biases.
Nobody botched anything. He just wasn't ready, and Fisher said multiple times that he didn't want to put him in a position to fail. He didn't want him out there doing what he did in preseason. Missing calls, not recognizing defenses, not knowing when to audible, not knowing what to audible into, and all the other little things that nobody on this board was privy to in practice. Just because some people 'ooh' and 'ahhh' at practice now doesn't mean he was a complete QB a month ago. It just means he can throw a nice ball, and we all knew he could do that anyway.
Fisher simply has a different plan for preparing Goff that doesn't align with other people's plans (who have no affiliation with the Organization). That's all. There is no refuting that irrefutable fact. It's just a different plan and nothing less. Suggesting it's more than that, or that it's a bad plan, takes you into the realm of subjectivity.
Now let me start your reply for you.
"No...."
You can argue that although Fisher said he didn't want to put Goff in a position to fail that he indirectly has done just that - put him in a failed position
Just look at all the speculation floating around non-stop with how Goff isn't catching the blitz or hoe Mannion is the preferred choice - i mean how do you access the growth of a player holding the clipboard? You can't. It doesn't exist, cause there is no advantage to sitting otherwise Mannion who has sat for longer should be fsrther along than Goff. I guarsntee you (purely speculation) that Goff confidence has not increased on measure since being drafted by Fisher and Co