- Joined
- Jul 15, 2010
- Messages
- 14,462
- Name
- Bo Bowen
Looking for opinions here about an incident that happened at the job last month.
Here's the scenario
Production line has been maxed out for awhile now due to increased speeds of making the product (paper). EE A has been dogging it for some time and rest of crew have had it with backing them up for some time. It's the heat of summer and not many breaks to be had when somebody is thwarting your best efforts to keep up. So EE B has had enough. He goes over to EE A's workstation to request he keep it moving. EE A (25 yr EE ) tells him to F off, shoves him, then takes a swing. These guys are in a room about the size of a double phone booth. EE B (2 yr EE) proceeds to punch in combinations until EE A is swollen about the head and neck. Altercation is stopped by other EEs and supervisor. Subsequently, both EEs are fired.
I understand the company is in a difficult position here because if you don't fire the guys, you are de facto condoning their actions. And if you fire just one, you are probably opening yourself up to some sort of litigation. But, if you are not going to let EE B defend himself, it seems you are opening up another can of worms. The next guy that gets punched would seemingly have an open and shut case against the company for not providing a safe work environment because he feels he would be fired for defending himself. What say ye arm chair litigators?
Here's the scenario
Production line has been maxed out for awhile now due to increased speeds of making the product (paper). EE A has been dogging it for some time and rest of crew have had it with backing them up for some time. It's the heat of summer and not many breaks to be had when somebody is thwarting your best efforts to keep up. So EE B has had enough. He goes over to EE A's workstation to request he keep it moving. EE A (25 yr EE ) tells him to F off, shoves him, then takes a swing. These guys are in a room about the size of a double phone booth. EE B (2 yr EE) proceeds to punch in combinations until EE A is swollen about the head and neck. Altercation is stopped by other EEs and supervisor. Subsequently, both EEs are fired.
I understand the company is in a difficult position here because if you don't fire the guys, you are de facto condoning their actions. And if you fire just one, you are probably opening yourself up to some sort of litigation. But, if you are not going to let EE B defend himself, it seems you are opening up another can of worms. The next guy that gets punched would seemingly have an open and shut case against the company for not providing a safe work environment because he feels he would be fired for defending himself. What say ye arm chair litigators?