Winners and losers from preseason week 2

[FRO]

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000379947/article/winners-and-losers-from-preseason-week-2

 

[Tron]

Our rb depth is fine, and Mason has been fine for the most part. Losing Pead is not gonna ruin us at rb depth.

 

[FRO]

Our rb depth is fine, and Mason has been fine for the most part. Losing Pead is not gonna ruin us at rb depth.

I think the writer just looked at stats. Mason has looked good. Pead was on the bubble anyways.

 

[blue4]

Bradford fights an mystery uphill battle and the rookie 3rd round back is unimpressive because he's behind last years most impressive rookie and a very solid Cunningham. Who are these people and how do they keep jobs? Why not just put a large flashing sign on the article saying "I have not actually seen them play yet."

 

[Tron]

I think the writer just looked at stats. Mason has looked good. Pead was on the bubble anyways.

Yea, they never do. Still annoying. One day they will post educated guesses and info. Maybe.....

 

[FRO]

Yea, they never do. Still annoying. One day they will post educated guesses and info. Maybe.....

If we make it to the playoffs on a regular basis, then maybe. Until then they will look at stat sheets and make a guess. When Mason has room to run he looks great.

 

[Tron]

If we make it to the playoffs on a regular basis, then maybe. Until then they will look at stat sheets and make a guess. When Mason has room to run he looks great.

But they dont guess off the top of their heads with the Browns:eek:

Agree with winning will do more for it.

 

[AZRamsFan93]

I think the writer just looked at stats. Mason has looked good. Pead was on the bubble anyways.

Mason has looked good running. The well documented issues with his horrible pass blocking will signal "running play" to the defense any time he is in the backfield.

 

[Tony iz Ramlike]

Meh if that's the only thing they find bad that i'm okay with that because it's not bad