Will there or won’t there be competition for starting punter?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Will there or won’t there be competition for starting punter?​

The LA Rams ended the 2020 season with a pledge from head coach Sean McVay. That pledge? To improve every aspect of their team with the introduction of competition. Even at quarterback? Yes, especially at quarterback.

And that marked the beginning of the end of the LA Rams relationship with starting quarterback Jared Goff. The LA Rams paid Goff to perform among the best of the NFL, to generate the type of production to ensure that the Rams offense remained among the Top-10 scoring offenses of the NFL. But perhaps even more than that, the Rams paid Goff to secure the football and minimize errors that would create turnovers.

In 2020, Goff was unable to deliver in either category. Not a mere slip, but an outright regressive freefall. And it happened despite the Rams coaching staff emphasizing the need to improve at the quarterback area in several key areas. And when the 2020 season opened, there was reason to believe that some critical improvements were addressed.

The objective for Goff in 2020 was to learn how to throw off-sequence and from multiple platforms. Goff had gotten into the bad habit of throwing without velocity and off his back foot. That was a problem that needed correction. The problem was, after showing signs of improvement early in the season, Goff fell back into the horrifying bad habits once more. McVay had seen enough.

That underachievement set a number of events in motion that began with the surprising comments from head coach Sean McVay. It may have been fueled by disappointment or frustration, but the words are now a matter of public record. That’s a very important point for what comes next. Crucial, in fact.

Drop back and punt

The statement made by LA Rams head coach Sean McVay was shocking but final. Whether deliberately or without forethought, the Rams placed 53-players from the roster on notice. The 2020 season ended with disappointment, and the Rams were determined to ensure that anyone on the roster deemed ‘good enough’ was no longer good enough. Huh? Well, don’t take my word for it. McVay started it.

You see, statements from a head coach, whether calm or so livid that his face turns purple, carry significant weight and meaning when uttered.

That particular statement uttered by a very frustrated and angry LA Rams head coach Sean McVay cut across the entire roster, perhaps even more than originally intended. But when he was afforded the opportunity to restate his intentions, he doubled down by repeating the claim.

The statement was put out there into the media that the LA Rams would be competing at each and every position, but was the team prepared to see that through? Well, the front office certainly seemed to take it all at face value because they added the NFL’s best punter, Corey Bojorquez, off waivers this offseason. Bojorquez is very good, folks. He’s also rather young.

Pairing his addition to the Rams roster with the head coach’s statement of competition at every position, the logical conclusion was that the LA Rams was creating competition for the punter role. After all, Hekker was one of the highest-paid punters in the NFL. Until 2020, he was worth every penny. However, last season? Not so much.

Saving dollars with some change

As with every competition on an NFL roster, the criteria involve production on the football field, as well as the strain on the pursestrings. In any contrast and comparison, that ‘how much will he cost” component is always part of the roster build. The key to success at the NFL GM level, therefore, is to fit the best cohesive roster under the annual NFL salary cap.

Paying too much for a player can be as fatal as not obtaining enough talent. And so, the financial impact of Johnny Hekker’s contract became a talking point for the ‘compete at every position’ 2021 Rams. Behold, there were substantial savings to the team if the Rams found reason to promote another punter to the starting role.

Why would the Rams even consider starting any punter in the NFL? Well, Corey Bojorquez is not just any ole punter. He was the best punter in the NFL in 2020. For comparison purposes, Johnny Hekker was ranked 21st among NFL punters in 2020. That is significant because the 5.2 yards improvement in gross yards was nearly matched by 4.3 yards in net yardage. If you factor that in on the number of punts over the course of a season, and suddenly the Rams added nearly 300 additional yards that opposing offenses needed to claim on the football field.

Better production for a cheaper cost? That is often enough incentive to push an NFL team to move quickly. But this is Johnny Hekker after all, right? He is still deserving of some patience. After all, he is the last holdout to ST coordinator John Fassel’s regime with the Rams.

Even Hekker admits underperformance

Why would anyone dare to hold LA Rams star punter up for any discernment or scrutiny? Think back to the comments made by head coach Sean McVay. Competition on the entire roster. But surely that doesn’t apply to Johnny Hekker, right? Tell that to Hekker, who took it all in stride. Does he deserve competition? Yes. Why?

Well, perhaps because as he admits himself, 2020 was one of his worst NFL seasons:

“I definitely did not perform to the best of my abilities,” Hekker said. “There were a few games that I really, I don’t know, just kind of got just may be ahead of myself mentally. . . . There were definitely some kicks out there that I would have liked to have seen go better for the team. When I don’t put our team in good positions, that’s the stuff that really bugs me.” –per Johnny Hekker via ProFootballTalk NBCSports Charean Williams

And as far as competition? Surely a tried and tested veteran doesn’t want to go back to square one and fight for his job, does he? What is Hekker’s perspective on the sudden surprising addition of the NFL’s best punter from 2020?

“When push comes to shove, they have to make the best decisions for this roster. And there’s no running around the financial aspect of it. So, you’ve got to do what you’ve got to do to put together the best roster that you can.” ” –per Johnny Hekker as reported by LA Times Gary Klein

And there is the whole narrative, laid out rather neatly. Practically anyone attached to a special team’s specific role for the LA Rams under ST coordinator John Fassel has been scooped up by the Dallas Cowboys. Johnny Hekker is the last remaining holdout. Will the Rams do the unthinkable, and part ways from Johnny Hekker? Well here comes another unexpected twist in the road.

Retraction

Despite the pledge to compete at each and every spot on the roster, once the evidence was assembled and the logic was presented back to the LA Rams regarding any plans to create competition at the punter position, the Rams head coach Sean McVay retracted his earlier pledge to create competition everywhere.

While he agreed with McVay, Snead pointed out that training camp is filled with competition by its very nature. And by hinting at such, Snead was leaving the door open for any future decisions to go either way.

So here we are, trying to gauge the potential of the LA Rams roster, and trying to understand what roster decisions have yet to be made, and which roster positions are still undecided. As popular as punter Johnny Hekker might be with the entire fanbase of the LA Rams, I am not convinced that he is an automatic starter in 2021. Loyalty? I get it. Hekker has done great things for the Rams over the years.

Still, Jared Goff is gone because good enough is no longer good enough at quarterback. Austin Blythe is gone because good enough is no longer good enough at the offensive center. Michael Brockers is gone because good enough is no longer good enough at defensive lineman. Johnny Hekker was ranked 21st out of 32 punters in the NFL in 2020. Is that good enough for the LA Rams? Good enough wasn’t good enough for three other veterans who were very loyal to the team. This could be a very intriguing developing story throughout this training camp.
 

nighttrain

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
9,225
Hekk at 31 is still a young man, punters have been known to stick around a lot longer than most other position players
train
 

shovelpass

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
4,727
I don't know what the PS rules will be this season but having a good back up in case of emergency is a good idea.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,187
I have been pleasantly surprised at the number of quality punters around the league in recent years and immediately thought that Bojorquez was brought in to compete with Hekker for the job. The depth in the league at the position could explain Bojorquez' availability. But there is more to punting than just distance. Hekker has been masterful at pinning teams inside the ten through the years. It will be interesting to see how it unfolds and what comes next. I'm betting on Hekker, but no matter which one wins, I'll be interested to see what happens next. What is a good punter worth just before the season? They cannot stash Bojorquez on the PS without having him claimed. What kind of draft pick can they get for a good punter? Does Hekker's contract make him less tradeable, or does his track record make him more desirable?
One thing I find interesting is how Hekk's play dipped in conjunction with Fassel's departure. That's the type of coincidence that might indicate something. Not saying that Fassel made him that great or anything but maybe Hekk had issues with the way the new guy coaches and it spilled onto the field.

But you ask some interesting questions there. I don't think significant picks are in play for a punter but I'd take a late rounder vice seeing the guy cut that's for damn sure. :blub:
 

Flatlyner

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
5,007
Honestly, we are talking about punters here. Yes, Hekker is beloved by the team and fans, but, he is the top paid punter in the NFL. Has he performed like the top paid punter in the NFL the last 2 years? No. We need to cut the cap edges everywhere possible to resign guys like D.Will. IMO, if they are even close to each other in camp, Hekk and his top salary (almost 4m) will be the one to go. I think Bojorquez is being paid slightly above 1m and will be our punter going forward. I would, and I think the Rams would, like to use the 3m saved elsewhere to make the team better. Especially when you consider Boj performed as the best punter in league last year. Its a no brainer for me.
 

Psycho_X

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
12,375
Honestly, we are talking about punters here. Yes, Hekker is beloved by the team and fans, but, he is the top paid punter in the NFL. Has he performed like the top paid punter in the NFL the last 2 years? No. We need to cut the cap edges everywhere possible to resign guys like D.Will. IMO, if they are even close to each other in camp, Hekk and his top salary (almost 4m) will be the one to go. I think Bojorquez is being paid slightly above 1m and will be our punter going forward. I would, and I think the Rams would, like to use the 3m saved elsewhere to make the team better. Especially when you consider Boj performed as the best punter in league last year. Its a no brainer for me.

Well, kinda breaks down a little less than that because you have to account for Bojo's salary if cutting Hekker but you also have to factor in that Bojo is only on a one year deal. So if they cut Hekker and keep Bojo for one year we will then have to turn around and give him a probable top ten punter contract next offseason thus likely using up any savings beyond this year by simply swapping them. Or possible having to find another punter already.

So it's really only about 2021 cap hit and whether they want to take that and push it to next year. Obviously competition will matter but if Hekker still shows to be his old self is $1.58 million for one year and maybe some chump change future years worth it? I'm not saying it's not but I don't see the obvious value in just going with the cheaper option without proving he is the better punter first.
Hekker's cap hit$ 4,937,000.00
Hekker's Dead cap if released$ (2,329,000.00)
Hekker's release savings$ 2,608,000.00
Bojo salary$ (1,020,000.00)
Actual savings 2021$ 1,588,000.00
 

Tano

Legend
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
10,295
One thing I find interesting is how Hekk's play dipped in conjunction with Fassel's departure. That's the type of coincidence that might indicate something. Not saying that Fassel made him that great or anything but maybe Hekk had issues with the way the new guy coaches and it spilled onto the field.

But you ask some interesting questions there. I don't think significant picks are in play for a punter but I'd take a late rounder vice seeing the guy cut that's for damn sure. :blub:
I still say Hekker's performance went down the tube after the Miami game because of the punt coverage in that game.

He gave up trying to kick it as far as he could and instead went for shorter higher punts with no returns.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,672
Also, they will have a ton of FA to sign next year. Releasing him now might get them a comp pick but more importantly, it will clear $4.7 M of cap.
No and no...
Releasing him would make him a free agent, but the Rams wouldnt get a comp pick if he signed with another team. That's only when you lose an UFA after their contract runs out.
As for CAP savings, there's not much there. If they release him now, they'd "save" his 3.75 mill salary while absorbing a 2.3 mill cap hit. Would save about 1.4 mill, until they pay Bojo 1 mill, overall savings 400K

Seems to me it's a clear case of let the better man win. Hekker net cost is 1.4 mill, Bojo 1 mill.

On second thought, the Rams keep changing the way business is done.
First they showed the league that starters dont need to play pre-season
Then they showed the value of making trades, and signing cut players vs UFA, thus gaining comp picks
Now they're testing the "1st round picks are irrelevant" theory.....TBD
So maybe the next play will be carrying 2 punters, 51 man roster for the rest of them!
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,847
I want to see what Bojorquez can do in a more controlled environment.

J Hekker better bring his A-game. Still a big fan but, he has faded in the recent past. McVay is right on with competing for positions. Players need to know that they are not automatically given a spot starting or on the roster. I'm looking for great competition all around camp. When Hekker is pinning teams deep or booming a punt that changes field position he is worth every penny he gets.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
23,248
Name
Dennis
Starting punter?
1626124095737.png

1626124122527.png

1626124168266.png
 

oldnotdead

Legend
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
5,406
Dieterbrock you are totally right I stand corrected thank you. I had a brain fart from the burrito my GF made me for lunch. But the main benefit would come with clearing Hekker's cap for next year. I believe his contract runs a couple of years.

IMO both Hekker and Havenstein are deadmen walking and it would be better for all concerned if both are released for cap and roster reasons. Hekker is a good punter, but age and money bring an end to all good things in the NFL. Good enough isn't good enough when your cap is almost $5M a year.

The problem is that Bojorquez is a FA next year so they would have to negotiate an affordable contract so this would basically be a one year prove it deal. But even then his cap cost should still be about half of Hekker's. It's the cost of carrying a star driven roster. Cuts have to be made somewhere.

I still say the one contract that stands out is Havenstein who is being paid like a proven good vet but plays at a mediocre level.
 

RamDino

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Messages
2,918
No and no...
Releasing him would make him a free agent, but the Rams wouldnt get a comp pick if he signed with another team. That's only when you lose an UFA after their contract runs out.
As for CAP savings, there's not much there. If they release him now, they'd "save" his 3.75 mill salary while absorbing a 2.3 mill cap hit. Would save about 1.4 mill, until they pay Bojo 1 mill, overall savings 400K

Seems to me it's a clear case of let the better man win. Hekker net cost is 1.4 mill, Bojo 1 mill.

On second thought, the Rams keep changing the way business is done.
First they showed the league that starters dont need to play pre-season
Then they showed the value of making trades, and signing cut players vs UFA, thus gaining comp picks
Now they're testing the "1st round picks are irrelevant" theory.....TBD
So maybe the next play will be carrying 2 punters, 51 man roster for the rest of them
The value of making trades is underestimated. They pulled off a blockbuster trade 1 minute after the season ended. I think they got lucky with Holmes going to Detroit and their star QB deciding he wants out but you have to hand it to McSnead.
 

tklongball

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
1,235
We have 1 Very good Punter in Bojo, and... One Who, worst case scenairo, was the best in the league a couple years ago. Of course there is a competition, and either guy can win out. My money is on Bojo, but we will see.
 

fanotodd

Diehard
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 2, 2013
Messages
2,330
Name
Fanotodd
Hekker was easily the MVP of the fisher era but times change. His game vs da Bears was a clinic and showed just how good Johnny Hekker can and has been over his career.

OTOH, it seems he was out-performed in numerous games last season by the opposing punter. Maybe they got up for those games knowing Hekker was on the other sideline. It showed just how many talented punters there are across the league.

Losing kickers, long-snappers, and punters are an easy and typical way of cutting costs without touching either side of the ball.
Just saying.
...but it would be kinda heartbreaking to see Johnny go.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,609
Name
Burger man
I don’t see Hekker going anywhere.

Punter stats aren’t black and white.

I would guess to evaluate a punter each punt needs to be evaluated based on what the punter was trying to do. Grade it. Add that up somehow to determine performance; strengths and weaknesses.

My guess is; Hekker is not only a good punter statistically, he is good at doing what the coaches ask him to do with his kicks. And… the latter goes beyond stats.
 

So Ram

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
15,393

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
23,248
Name
Dennis
I saw that & who is who ???
Johnny was holding for Gay,which told the real story.Sort of fake news if you play into that way ??

That’s not Jordan Fuller holding there,so wtf ? Just saying from what Mcvay keeps saying is Johnny is the man,at least until he is not.I’d say this will be his last season if not a Pro Bowler.

It was Brandon Wright the other punter/kick off specialist on the squad.