I always say anytime you can draft the best player at a position, you grab him, regardless of need or the round. How can that be a bad pick?
The two examples I use:
1) Travis Frederick (C). The cowboys were roasted for jumping the gun on him at the bottom of the 1rst round. They felt he would not be there when they picked again. He helped rebuild that OL and was having a stellar career when an illness cut it short.
2) Aaron Donald. The only above average unit the Rams had that year was their DL.
Now there’s a third:
3) Jarrod Verse. He absolutely was the best Edge rusher in the draft. Yes, he fit a position of need, but there were other options that did the same.
OT: the Rams needed (and still) needed one, but those who were drafted after #19 were not thought of as the “best”. Those guys had been drafted.
WR: there were some good WRs drafted after #19, but everyone knew the top WR was going to be either harrison or nabors.
CB: there were 3 outstanding CBs this season and IIRC, all three were available at #19. Lassiter (texans) and BOTH starting CBs on the eagles.
The Rams could have selected a number of players at #19 who would have helped this team, but would any of them impacted the team/season as much as Verse?
If Bech is the one WR the Rams feel is clearly better than any other WR in this draft and you can’t say that about any other player at another position at #26…you grab him.
Now, is that what we are saying about Bech?
If not, there might be other, better options like a TE or CB.