While I believe Michel is the stronger runner, I think Henderson adds more to the offense (running, receiving, pass protections, etc. ) and Akers is better (when healthy....) at all those phases of the game than Hendo. Yes, yesterday, we had a renewed dedication to the run game. But let's face it. This team is designed to score quick and get the lead in a hurry. Running the ball, while allowing you to control the clock, will not strike quickly in most scenarios. McVay is not Martz, but he is a pass first coach, who uses the run to set up the pass and vise versa. When we get the lead, it allows our defense to play pass first, which plays to our defensive strengths. I know some would love to return to the "Ground Chuck" era. But controlling the clock needs a better offensive line than we have. And with today's "spread" offenses, aren't as effective as they once were (controlling the clock). Look at the Whiners. They have beaten us 5 straight times. But they've lost to the Squawks 4 straight. Who in turn, lost to us 6 of the past 7 times. Teams are designed that way to matchup against certain teams better than others. I'm glad we got Michel. In the right circumstances he could be a "Bell Cow" back. And with Woods out, might be featured more from that perspective (Admit it Jefferson and OBJ are talented........but they ain't no Bobby Trees........). Time will tell. But I picked Henderson at this juncture. He's more of a 3rd down back than Michel. But he also opens things up better as well.
Just my thoughts.....