Which QB should the Rams draft next year and where?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
You don't take Cole Payton if Stafford is retiring. And we better know what Stafford's plans are before FA and the Draft. You take Cole Payton if Stafford is planning to play another year or two. He's a project. What I like about him is he's 6'2+" 230 with 10+ inch mitts, 4.5/4.6 speed, and a strong arm. He needs to clean up his throwing motion, and he is not at all ready to start in the NFL. But he has the size, strength, mobility, and arm talent to be a starting QB. Does he have the instincts, processing ability, and football IQ? That is the question. But at the right place in the Draft, I'm good with us taking the shot.

P.S. In addition to the 16 passing TDs, he had 13 rushing TDs. Rushing TDs count for the same amount of points as passing TDs.

One thing I'm now seeing that makes his Senior Bowl performance more impressive for me is that he suffered a bad break to his thumb on his throwing hand and had surgery to fix it in December. That's not an easy injury to come back from on a quick turnaround. Takes some balls to go out there and compete. Intriguing option.

Yes, that cannot be ignored, however, when concerned with one’s ability to play the QB position, seeing only 3 more passing TDs than rushing TDs is actually more concerning than not.
 
Yes, that cannot be ignored, however, when concerned with one’s ability to play the QB position, seeing only 3 more passing TDs than rushing TDs is actually more concerning than not.
There's a lot to factor in instead of just looking at raw bulk stats IMO
 
I expect the Rams are looking for a QB2 in this draft, to take over that role in '27 when Bennett leaves in FA. If that is the case then the small QBs are all in play. And of those small QBs I'd guess they take Klubnik because he's mobile, feels the rush reasonably well, and has enough arm. His weaknesses don't matter so much if it is a QB2 role they see him filling, where ok maybe if he develops we have a bridge QB potentially as well.

But it's also possible they want a guy with all the tools to cook on the depth chart for a year or two. If so then it's one of the bigger QBs they would target that they like his work ethic, personality, etc and project he has a chance. That's when you get into the guys like Payton, Allar, etc.

Strength of the smaller dudes in this class are that they look more ready to run an offense earlier as a QB2. But we don't know what the Rams plans are there. They may plan to keep Bennett in that role at a cheap contract level, who knows.
 
Yes, that cannot be ignored, however, when concerned with one’s ability to play the QB position, seeing only 3 more passing TDs than rushing TDs is actually more concerning than not.
Is it concerning? They were a run-first offense. He had a TD% of 7.1%. For reference, Stafford led the NFL with a TD% of 7.7% in 2025.

Nobody is denying that the lack of starting experience and low number of pass attempts are problems. But also, they're less problematic because nobody is advocating drafting him in Round 1. I don't see much merit to statistical criticisms. The numbers he put up were fine.
 
Is it concerning? They were a run-first offense. He had a TD% of 7.1%. For reference, Stafford led the NFL with a TD% of 7.7% in 2025.

Nobody is denying that the lack of starting experience and low number of pass attempts are problems. But also, they're less problematic because nobody is advocating drafting him in Round 1. I don't see much merit to statistical criticisms. The numbers he put up were fine.

It is concerning. Were they run first because they didn’t have a QB who could be dependable in a pass first offense? Were they designed runs or is he not seeing the field or going through progressions so he is quick to use his legs. The jump from college to the pros is hard enough, let alone for an inexperienced player coming from his level of competition,

Is he “one year away” from being able to replace Stafford? Because if that answer is no, then he’s not worth the time developing. Stafford, if he does decide to give it another year, probably has one year left given all the offseason stuff he’s been putting out there over the last few seasons. We need a plug and play, or one year away player.
 
Well all know this. But since we don't know the Rams board we are speculating.

I have a feeling Payton is gonna climb, or may be higher than the media sites have him based on his raw tools. So there could be a lot of teams who have him round 2 or maybe higher who knows. He's probably the best fit for the Rams given that he's got real talent and can sit on our depth chart behind a great QB and soak it in.

The smaller guys I think are closer together than the media sites list them. Keep saying I'm fine with Simpson and I trust the Rams. But I think the ideal world for this draft is let some team overdraft him while we load this defense or add another WR weapon for Stafford.

If I had to put a draft window value on Simpson I'd say he's a round 2 type, and that's by overlooking the small sample size which bugs me. I just prefer a longer window of hard knocks with these guys. And if he is a round 2 value, which who knows what teams think, then it would make sense for us to take a shot on him with our late 1st round pick. But I'd rather have one of these higher ranked NTs or one of the wideouts, or one of the corners because I want another title with Stafford.
I'm in the camp with you on this draft strategy.
Don't know what the Rams brass' take is on this, but I'm thinking that they know that our window is now, and "eff them draft the BPA picks" nonsense for at least this go around, anyways.
There's plenty of talent and choices at our positions of need this draft, IMO.
Make it so.
 
I'm in the camp with you on this draft strategy.
Don't know what the Rams brass' take is on this, but I'm thinking that they know that our window is now, and "eff them draft the BPA picks" nonsense for at least this go around, anyways.
There's plenty of talent and choices at our positions of need this draft, IMO.
Make it so.
Of course, banking on rookies for an immediate impact can be a recipe for failure at any position.
 
It is concerning. Were they run first because they didn’t have a QB who could be dependable in a pass first offense? Were they designed runs or is he not seeing the field or going through progressions so he is quick to use his legs. The jump from college to the pros is hard enough, let alone for an inexperienced player coming from his level of competition,

Is he “one year away” from being able to replace Stafford? Because if that answer is no, then he’s not worth the time developing. Stafford, if he does decide to give it another year, probably has one year left given all the offseason stuff he’s been putting out there over the last few seasons. We need a plug and play, or one year away player.
No, they were run first because that has been their offense for years. Since 2021, their starting QB has thrown for 20+ TDs only once.
 
I'm not so sure that McVay just doesn't stay the course with the 3 we have. Outside of Mendoza who is gong #1, is there another QB clearly better than Bennett?
 
I'm not so sure that McVay just doesn't stay the course with the 3 we have. Outside of Mendoza who is gong #1, is there another QB clearly better than Bennett?
Well, for one thing all 3 QB's could be gone after 26'. Of course Jimmy could leave now, but if he comes back on a one year deal again, then you could head into the 27' off-season with no returning QB's. Not sure that's ideal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldSchool
And when has any of them done anything significant in the NFL? Carson Wentz was the last one?
Who cares? Cole Payton is Cole Payton. They've had a run-first offense for years. They didn't suddenly implement one because he can't throw the ball. The prior QB, Cam Miller, was drafted in the 6th round last year. So they haven't had bums at the position.
 
Well, for one thing all 3 QB's could be gone after 26'. Of course Jimmy could leave now, but if he comes back on a one year deal again, then you could head into the 27' off-season with no returning QB's. Not sure that's ideal.
If they have to pay Stafford more cap, then I think it is unlikely they spend backup money on the QB2 spot. Having a more expensive backup who loses in the playoffs just screws up draft priority if 9 misses time. This is why I figure they elevate Bennett.