What's your thoughts on Chris Shula?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
I like Shula but he has some mishaps in situational football.

Example. 3rd and forever, and he drops Stewart and Young into zone coverage and sent Wallace and Kitchens on the blitz. Result; easy completion for a first down. This was when it was 20 - 13 Rams and they were trying to hang on to the lead.

A real bone head call and gave the Commodes life late in the game. Yes we won and pulled it out, but if we're gonna want to beat better teams we can't let the play calling beat us and honestly that type of shit will sink the ship that is barely floating.
I mention the DBs come from to far back and timing issues. I didn't realize that he dropped Steward and Young. Far to often the Rams let up big yardage on 2nd and 3rd downs, Just when they have a team on the ropes they seem to relax. I guess Shula overthinks these situations. I would like to see an overview of results when he drops D Linemen into coverage. I notice Fiske gets dropped. When it's 3rd and 21 you have to stop the offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brucebruce
With all due respect, the last four teams were:
WASH
LAC
LV
AZ

Against teams I would consider as upper tier, they were pretty porous:
SF - 27 (Yes, unusual circumstances but still)
DEN - 30
BUF - 37
That's an average of 31 PPG

I was listening to the post game show on ESPNLA. They basically said how I feel:
Unless there is some epiphany... when the Rams play the better teams (GB, SEA twice, KC, SF), they/I do not feel confident that Shula's defense will look anything like it does against these also-rans.

Just my $.02 - but the guys who cover them locally seem to agree.
The Buffalo game was ugly and the only one I felt landed in Shula’s lap. Seemed like the completely wrong approach and we had no answers or adjustments.
 
  • High Five
Reactions: BC Ramfan
Denver had a pick 6 in that game - and short fields most of the game to work with. For context - they had 186 yards in passing and 78 yards in rushing. I would take that kind of defensive production.

The Buffalo game was ugly and the only one I felt landed in Shula’s lap. Seemed like the completely wrong approach and we had no answers or adjustments.
Got it... I just have this feeling, after watching the fundamentals of this defense this year (coverage technique, tackling, angles, etc.)

If the defense limits the opponents when we play the upper tier teams I mentioned, the question will be answered either way. With Garrett back, they should dominate.

Hopefully, I eat crow and admit I was wrong.
 
  • Cheers
Reactions: LARAMSinFeb.
Well, @Rmfnlt - you aren't wrong on Buffalo and SF - although those two offenses seem to be eating most defenses for breakfast.

Still, it looks more and more likely that if this team wins, it is going to be on the defense and a running game. I'd like to see the offense start to gel a bit more - but we don't have a lot of time to figure things out here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rmfnlt
I like blitzing and more press coverage....though, I dont ever recall seeing a team's DBs run into each other as often as ours have this year. Most of that was with backups in, and that's the rub. Without Watson, you roll the dice there....but with MG and company, have to think we get home more often now
 
I think that we have yet to see the best of this D.

I also think that with the Offense issues and the tough schedule.. they need to consider going WAY more aggressive.

This team is playing with 2 of three phases in really bad shape.. D needs to absolutely dominate,
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fire Ants
I like the fact that the CBs line up closer to the LOS.

I also like that they don't seem to give up as many 3rd & long first downs.

Also, and maybe I'm wrong, but the D is REALLY tough when opponents are in the red zone this year.

Run D looks to be better than in previous years.
 
Fans all want tight man coverage and all out blitzes, every play. :laugh1::laugh1::laugh1::laugh1:
Shula has been solid overall. Flores is the current standard as well as spags. Both love to bring the heat and we all love that. I liked seeing Garrett lined up over the Center last game which resulted in a sack. I expect Shula will show the rookie that in this game and drop Garrett back while bringing something off the edge.
 
With all due respect, the last four teams were:
WASH
LAC
LV
AZ

Against teams I would consider as upper tier, they were pretty porous:
SF - 27 (Yes, unusual circumstances but still)
DEN - 30
BUF - 37
That's an average of 31 PPG

I was listening to the post game show on ESPNLA. They basically said how I feel:
Unless there is some epiphany... when the Rams play the better teams (GB, SEA twice, KC, SF), they/I do not feel confident that Shula's defense will look anything like it does against these also-rans.

Just my $.02 - but the guys who cover them locally seem to agree.
This is my main problem. The D has been bad against good teams and not just because they give up a lot of points. It is how it happens. Against SF it was the same old story and the D played the exact D they use to loose to them every time. Against Denver I will give them a little pass, seeing as they made the play to win the game and got screwed, but the second Watson got hurt the D went back into the prevent type D which always ends up leaving us vulnerable to screwy plays and calls instead of being aggressive. Buffalo though was the worst because the D kept everything that Buffalo did under control except the QB runs. Just like the SF game the bills beat us because we didn't adjust to what kept beating us. That makes me really doubt shula.
 
I think it's pretty complicated. Other teams know that against the Rams you need to get the ball out quick. So somehow you have to dial up pressure, try stop the screens and dink and dunks, and then don't allow the big plays or the mobile qb's to beat you, and slow the run down. Now you have the players you have. They have to do their jobs. Overall Shula is doing a very decent job. I sure don't have defensive coaching experience or analytical ability to tell him what he's doing wrong. I think he's calling the game as he sees it unfolding. Sometimes it works, sometimes the other side is better.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ramstien
My thoughts, he better call the games of his life during the next 2-3 games because the offense probably won't do shit so short handed.
I know that is the prevailing thought, but I think this will be a blessing in disguise and shake the offense out of its funk. Make Stafford look around more. Make McVay call on other players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ramstien
Fans all want tight man coverage and all out blitzes, every play. :laugh1::laugh1::laugh1::laugh1:
Shula has been solid overall. Flores is the current standard as well as spags. Both love to bring the heat and we all love that. I liked seeing Garrett lined up over the Center last game which resulted in a sack. I expect Shula will show the rookie that in this game and drop Garrett back while bringing something off the edge.
Never take Garrett out of the pass rush. Never.
 
I know that is the prevailing thought, but I think this will be a blessing in disguise and shake the offense out of its funk. Make Stafford look around more. Make McVay call on other players.
I hope you are correct there. Hopefully McVay calls plays to make teams pay because I'm sure they will be pressing and have more loaded boxes against us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: majrleaged
In my book, Sheila overall has his defense prepared for game situations. They generally use good technique and are in position.

My problem with him and I do not know if it is Mcvay is the lack of aggression, lack of blitzing, lack of man coverage, and a safe approach with heavy zone that makes a quarterback comfortable, resulting in a defense being equal or less than the sum of its parts.

However, he has shown the ability to break from this philosophical approach at times. I think his play calls overall show a lack of experience and he has a big learning curve left however he has shown growth and potential probably not the guy you want for a Super Bowl run, but maybe a good coordinator for the future.

The in game adjustments at times have been way too slow. For example, if Josh Allen is running through the middle of your defense, and you can see Nate landman cannot stop him. You need to make an adjustment namely, putting someone quicker in the landman roll that mistake led directly to a loss.

Some experience coaches out there like Brian, Flores or Vance, Joeseph Have really refined systems with optimized blitz team plays, called at exactly the right time to surprise the offense and get to the quarterback with a great understanding of the blocking scheme by the offense. Our blitzing under Shula always looks a little unrefined and late to get to the quarterback.
In the last game I saw him switch defense, had Dolic in a lot more in as the LB
 
I don't think he was quite ready when McVay put him in the role. But he's done a decent job I think given what he's had to work with.

Again he only had one season in the secondary, and that season was a fucking catastrophe. I don't know that he learned enough in that one year back there, so I think he's a DC who is best paired with a strong back end coach to help him out.

How much has he learned. Is he ready to be a top DC now? We're about to find out in this stretch of games ahead, particularly the KC, Green Bay, and SF games where he's going to need to shut them down for us to win. Because he isn't gonna have much offense or points on his side to work with unless his defense is dominating and giving us short fields and keeping us in those games.
 
I think the defense has been getting better as the season goes on, it is McVay and the offense that needs to improve.