OnceARam said:
bluecoconuts said:
Stranger said:
Tell me, what was the real reason we let SJ go? Was it because:
1) mgmt wanted RB-by-committe and SJ wanted to continue to be a feature back?
2) SJ wanted to go to a contender?
3) other?
Mixture of all three. Other being that they wanted to hand the team over to Bradford.
I agree; they wanted Bradford to take on 'the' leadership role... to see how he would respond. It's still an open question.
I also think they were trying to remake the offense to be explosive. Jackson is not explosive anymore. He can pile up yards through chipping away and occasionally busting off a 30 yarder. But, he is a smart vet who can block and catch as well.
I think the Rams had visions of all the explosive passing plays (seems ironic now) setting up a running game with younger faster backs. There is also the thing of paying an "older" RB with a lot of miles on his tires money.
Im sure it looked great on paper. I even drank that kool-aid.