- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 18,666
- Name
- Dave
I think us bringing back Britt and Barksdale are no-brainers. After that I like Wisneiewski, But aside from that, I'm still looking!
Riverumbbq I am with you on Barksdale but the Rams will sign him up to a high cost contract anyway they have few options. The California/San Fran Bay area Duo of high profile UFA OL'ers & cap killers will not be affordable nor would they come to a small NFL town like St Louis. Not sure if the Rams secondary with already around 8 safeties candidates available will have room for more $$$ candidates.
When healthy the former #1 Green Bay Packer is one excellent OT. He can play both OT posts very well. There is a large ButtMonkey here....health & injuries have been working on him .....a lot! You may want to take a minute & look deep into his surgeries & injuries list since coming into the NFL. He may be getting close to Rodger Saffold scale level.
I tend to believe the Rams are apt to let Barksdale seek his value thru free agency ala Saffold & Oakland. I'd be surprised and saddened if the Rams match a high outside bid. One reason I see Fisher and the Rams going deeper into their pockets for fewer but more expensive free agent talent is that Fisher absolutely NEEDS a winning season to maintain some control of his future job status, and bringing in top quality at positions of real need should help him get over the immediate hump. It won't exactly be 'CAP be damned' with the cuts of JLong, Wells, Langford and an extension for Bradford taking hold, but it will not be cheap. Whether free agents choose to come to St.Louis is another matter, one which is completely out of my control, but I can hope that Fisher's reputation as a 'players' coach helps in that regard. Doubtful, but maybe there is also more info on the possible Rams to LA front by the start of free agency.
As for Bulaga, like Saffold, he had a pretty healthy 2015 in that he only missed one start this season. Although Saffold required recent surgery, it didn't cost him much time off the field. Bulaga's history may also allow for some salary concessions. jmo.
Could be River, Barksdale is certainly no Rodger Saffold on the field or match Saffold's ability to play four OL posts where JB does just one and it not even done well. But the Packers OLT & sometimes ORT will demand UFA $$$ offensive LEFT OT contract. I do not see the Rams going that direction. Rams sure need a vet Swing OT but they will have to go short term contract not long term Buluga will not sign a short term.
As far as Wells & Long looks to me those two contacts (close to 15 million) will have to go before the Rams get heavy into UFA'cy. They have already restructured Wells contract once before, so I do not see another redo there. Wells is unworthy of consideration after his last three Ram seasons. His time has come.
Jake's......has some very big hanging hairs & burrs with his back to back ACL serious injuries & surgeries & two back to back rehabbing events after four straight off season surgeries & rehabbing events . Jake may have sure have big physical issues but the mental thing may be just too high way to big at this point to do a new redo contract at the time when the Rams are blowing through what little available UFA cap cash.
As I said before Kendall Langford will not released Rams have no legit back up to Brockers nor Donald to release a DL'er who can do both very good & save a roster spot too??? I think its a good bet he can get a new contract for a few more yrs here that would lower his cap hit in 2015.
We have had better luck with the Hayes and Britt types than the Finnagen and Long types. Free agency isn't a good way to build a team. You usually overpay for average or damaged talent.
Who are we going to get that we won't have to massively over pay. I'm good with picking up some guys to compete with the rookies, but throwing big money at the line hasn't worked for us outside of Timmerman.As a rule of thumb, I agree 100%. But every rule has some exceptions and I think this might be one. The OL needs lots of work and expecting multiple draft picks to step right in and turn the ship around would most likely lead to disappointment. Fisher's alway been hesitant to start rookies on the line anyway, and I can't see him plugging in say a rookie C and G to go along with a second-year LT. So I expect at least one free-agent signing. I'm hoping it's a short-term transitional deal, but I like that strategy better than counting entirely on unproven draft picks. Pick 'em, for sure, but give them time to get acclimated.
Who are we going to get that we won't have to massively over pay. I'm good with picking up some guys to compete with the rookies, but throwing big money at the line hasn't worked for us outside of Timmerman.
Injury history or not, no way GB lets Bulaga go.
It's a tough spot to be in, no doubt. And I'm the last one you'd want making that pick! There aren't likely to be any perfect solutions, but maybe a guy like Nick Hardwick, an older player who sat out due to an injury and who's back-up showed some promise, might become available. Yeah, I know, another injury-prone lineman. But again, no perfect solutions, and the injury history might keep his price down. I honestly don't know if that would be a good move or not or how much he has left in the tank--it's just one example. Like you said, sometimes a situation like Britt's--a guy other teams shy away from for one reason or another--can pan out if you do your homework. Yes, it's something of a crap shoot, but then so is trusting a recovering Sam Bradford (if that proves to be the case) to hold up behind a rookie-laden line. Hey, if they go that way I hope it works. I agree, if the right FA deal can't be done, then pass. But I wouldn't rule it out from the start.
Maybe, GB is in pretty good CAP shape, but they also have several very good players entering free agency. Not sure they can sign them all. John Kuhn, Randall Cobb, Bryan Bulaga, DT's Letroy Guion & BJ Raji, 3 CB's, a SS & an ILB.
This is a great thread. I have a few thoughts on offseason FA strategy...
One last thing about FA this offseason. I think S/F will go for top quality over quantity. That's been their trend lately.
As a rule of thumb, I agree 100%. But every rule has some exceptions and I think this might be one. The OL needs lots of work and expecting multiple draft picks to step right in and turn the ship around would most likely lead to disappointment. Fisher's alway been hesitant to start rookies on the line anyway, and I can't see him plugging in say a rookie C and G to go along with a second-year LT. So I expect at least one free-agent signing. I'm hoping it's a short-term transitional deal, but I like that strategy better than counting entirely on unproven draft picks. Pick 'em, for sure, but give them time to get acclimated.
Good for us, not so good for them, ... one big problem for SF this next year will be their ability to participate in free agency, they are already up against the CAP wall.
Not sure what you were responding to, our CAP should be better than the last several years. I was commenting on your statement that the 49'ers would be players in free agency for top talent.Cap shouldn't be a problem at all, River.
I'm assuming that J Long and Wells are released. That Bradford renegotiates. And that Langford takes a $3 million pay cut.
Plus I understand that the cap will be $10 million higher next year.
We should be just fine cap wise, I believe.
Not sure what you were responding to, our CAP should be better than the last several years. I was commenting on your statement that the 49'ers would be players in free agency for top talent.