- Joined
- Jun 20, 2014
- Messages
- 4,195
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #41
The difference is really easy to explain and let's see if you understand the difference in our wording after this. I don't like Rodger Saffold. He's injury prone, expensive and IMO not as good as some people think he is. But because I don't like our current starter that doesn't make it a roster hole. It makes it a roster spot I'd upgrade. You don't like our WR starters right now just like I don't like our LG but that doesn't make WR a hole.
Agree that Saffold is injury prone and expensive. Also agree that he is NFL starter quality.
Woods is a starter quality WR. Not a ProBowler, but starter quality.
However...
Tavon is not starter quality WR.
Cooper is not proven starter quality WR.
Spruce. Ditto.
Marquez. Ditto.
Thomas. Ditto.
All the rest. Ditto.
We need another starter quality WR. Don't know how I can speak more plainly.
TE is a similar situation. No proven starter quality TE's currently on the roster. Have a couple of guys that have "potential", but they're definitely not proven starter quality.
Hence, my use of the term "hole".
Just because we can give players a uniform and a helmet, then trot them out to take a snap at a WR or a TE position DOESN'T mean that they are "starter quality".