- Joined
- Jun 20, 2014
- Messages
- 4,137
I’m surprised that they couldn’t get it done earlier, tbh.
The tag could have been avoided altogether. I mean, Joyner’s value and tag price are so close together.
Why wouldn’t Joyner have been all over an offer of $10-11 million per for 5 years with significant g-jack security? Makes no sense.
Here’s the thing. They either extend him this year or they probably lose him next offseason. And let’s face it. Their record of extending in mid-year hasn’t been a good one lately.
That tag must be used for AD for the next 2-3 years. Unless AD and his pos agent come to their senses.
Extending Joyner should be a high priority.
The tag could have been avoided altogether. I mean, Joyner’s value and tag price are so close together.
Why wouldn’t Joyner have been all over an offer of $10-11 million per for 5 years with significant g-jack security? Makes no sense.
Here’s the thing. They either extend him this year or they probably lose him next offseason. And let’s face it. Their record of extending in mid-year hasn’t been a good one lately.
That tag must be used for AD for the next 2-3 years. Unless AD and his pos agent come to their senses.
Extending Joyner should be a high priority.