We hear all manner of criticism about Bradford on the internet nowadays. Those criticisms range from "no fire" to "total bust" to "could use some work." I don't think it's necessary to rehash all of the things that have slowed his development so much.
But instead ...
If you had to offer your own criticisms about Bradford - regardless of why - what would those be?
Correctable? Fatal flaw?
But instead ...
If you had to offer your own criticisms about Bradford - regardless of why - what would those be?
Correctable? Fatal flaw?