Yeah, that's pretty accurate. Those are the only 3 I can think of where he got it right. And the ones he got wrong ... ugly, just ugly.
We owe Jeff Fisher an apology for one thing
- Thread starter Rams4life
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Yeah, that's pretty accurate. Those are the only 3 I can think of where he got it right. And the ones he got wrong ... ugly, just ugly.
Classic Rams
Hall of Fame
Vs whiners:
Jeff Fisher: 3-6-1 (.500)
Sean McVay: 4-9 (.444)
Though he has 1 more win, McVay just dropped below Fisher in W-L %.
Jeff Fisher: 3-6-1 (.500)
Sean McVay: 4-9 (.444)
Though he has 1 more win, McVay just dropped below Fisher in W-L %.
You got the win percentages wrong
3-6-1 is close to .300 (not sure how ties work) and 4-9 is .308
Classic Rams
Hall of Fame
Ah, I see it now. I needed to divide the wins by the total games, not the losses. Doh, my bad.
---------------------------
winning % vs whiners:
Jeff Fisher: 3-6-1 (.3333)
Sean McVay: 4-9 (.3076)
both nothing to brag about, but damn ya think a better coach could figure this out after so many tries.
Last edited:
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #26
I'm gonna shoot my math teacher lol. I didn't know 3-6-1 was .500. Just kidding
Classic Rams
Hall of Fame
Fisher won 30% of the games vs the 9ersAh, I see it now. I needed to divide the wins by the total games, not the losses. Doh, my bad.
---------------------------
winning % vs whiners:
Jeff Fisher: 3-6-1 (.3333)
Sean McVay: 4-9 (.3076)
both nothing to brag about, but damn ya think a better coach could figure this out after so many tries.
McVay has won 30.7%
Sounds like a draw to me