- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 24,050
Honestly, Kennums play today was mediocre. If we have 5 TOs, we should have more than 17 pts. We only scored because Quick broke a tackle on a short route and Austin had a great return that put us in great position.
To be a playoff caliber team, we cannot miss open receivers. He cannot hit an out route to save his life, nor look past his first read. There were drives left on the table because he threw it short or just missed the guy.
Those few scrambles were awesome but he shouldn't keep the job because of that.
I'm not trying to undermine his performance, but he did just enough to get it done. I don't recall one throw he made where I was like, "damn, that's a good throw". If he's only game managing, Goff should play because I'm sure he can at least do that, just saying.
My crystal ball respectfully disagrees. Fisher didn't trade up to keep starting Keenum all year. He will however be patient and pick his spot for Goff.Told ya Goff wouldn't start at all this season.
With Keenum's "just enough" effort, which is still a paltry 15pts/game, you'll never see Jared.
You were wrong. Keenum IS good enough. Goff may be better, but we have no reason to believe that? Or don't wins matter anymore?
3-1, tie breaker, leader of NFCW.
My crystal ball respectfully disagrees. Fisher didn't trade up to keep starting Keenum all year. He will however be patient and pick his spot for Goff.
If Keenum is winning who really cares?I'll wager a 1000 creds that Goff won't see the field as a starter unless Keenum gets rekked or dies. Won't happen.
I wanted to see Goff push Keenum for ththe starting job but Keenum is winning and has improved every week. Gurley needs to get going. Once he does more plays will open up for this offense.
Simple...because I think it sends the wrong message to the team. You play well and win games = benched. I know you've been pounding the table for Goff Jerry and I'm not against you, I just think we should be patient while we have the luxury of a winning team. Keenum made some outstanding plays today and is looking better each week. I'm not ready to hit the reset button on the rapport/chemisty that's building.
That's reactionary, though. You play Goff because he's your best option, not because Keenum is hurting the team. If Goff makes this team better, he should be on the field as soon as he's ready. No reason to refuse to do it until it costs us games.
Why is it "the staff's failure to get Goff ready"? In fact why is it anyone's fault? Why isn't it the simple fact that has come to light that the "spread offense" so many colleges are using hinders these QBs when making the move to the NFL???This is how I feel too. But, with the staff's failure to get Goff ready, and Fisher's lack of trust in rookies, I doubt it happens without an injury to Case. If they ever want to get Gurley going they will need more of a threat at QB and WR imo.
The coaches will be able to tell.
I'd rather have growing pains now than over the final 5 weeks of the season or in the playoffs.
@CanRamFan :rolllaugh:You know, nothing good happens in da WACK... Gotta cross over the #1 to Sardis LMAO
To be fair, the receivers did come through today to some degree. The Austin and Quick balls were catchable, but they were very difficult catches to make. Frankly, Keenum's throw to Austin was great. So he takes no blame there. It's just a 50/50 play. You win some, you lose some. But Quick did come up with contested catches on both TDs, Gurley made a one-handed catch on the wheel route and another great grab to convert that 3rd down, and Britt made at least one tough catch in coverage to convert a first down.