Memphis Ram
Legend
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,838
You may be drunk on kool-aid. If I read you correctly you just predicted that we would win anywhere from 8 to 14 games. That is a pretty wide swing from also ran to home field advantage throughout the playoffs.Without watching the video I would just like to say, freak wagoner and his crappy expectations. Does he not remember that while the NFC west may be the toughest division in the NFL, it does not mean the Rams will be 0-6 in the division. I would think 4-2 would be more accurate, which would swing that to 10-6. I still see 10-12 wins as very possible. And if the D lives up to expectations 12-14 wins and a division championship.
I may be drunk on kool-aid, but I just dont see this team losing more than 8 games at the worst.
It wasn't too long ago that the NFC west was the joke of the nfl. The Niners, Seahawks, and cards can fall off just as fast as they came up bc of what they lost in the offseason.
Ok. You're "just sayin"...now I'm "just sayin"...the following:Y'all are cracking me up. If you look at our record prediction thread of old, I think the majority had us anywhere from 6-10 to 9-7.
Realistically we were counting on Bradford to get us over the hump this year. Without him we aren't shipping it in, but 6-10 certainly isn't disrespectful...we have a hard ass schedule and we lost our starting QB.
Just sayin...
Y'all are cracking me up. If you look at our record prediction thread of old, I think the majority had us anywhere from 6-10 to 9-7.
Realistically we were counting on Bradford to get us over the hump this year. Without him we aren't shipping it in, but 6-10 certainly isn't disrespectful...we have a hard ass schedule and we lost our starting QB.
Just sayin...
Y'all are cracking me up. If you look at our record prediction thread of old, I think the majority had us anywhere from 6-10 to 9-7.
Realistically we were counting on Bradford to get us over the hump this year. Without him we aren't shipping it in, but 6-10 certainly isn't disrespectful...we have a hard ass schedule and we lost our starting QB.
Just sayin...
Y'all are cracking me up. If you look at our record prediction thread of old, I think the majority had us anywhere from 6-10 to 9-7.
Realistically we were counting on Bradford to get us over the hump this year. Without him we aren't shipping it in, but 6-10 certainly isn't disrespectful...we have a hard ass schedule and we lost our starting QB.
Just sayin...
I agree that both teams take a small step backwards, but so have we. Seahawks prob run away with the division and it'll be a 3 team race to get to 10 wins.10-6 2nd in the NFC West (behind Seachickens). This division will not be as tough as last year. The Whiners and Cardinals will be at or below .500
We have taken a step backward from last year? Not sure I follow. We were terrible the first four games of the season, our defense was a sieve and our offense couldn't do jack. Now this year we have Greg Williams running the D with a potential DROY candidate in Donald, a year more experience for key players such as McD and Tree on D and Tavon, Stacy, Quick, Sted, on O. We added Robinson to the O-line and depth with Joseph. Hill is a definite upgrade over KC. Joyner looks like a real play maker in the slot. Where exactly do you see a step back? 7 games with Bradford when 4 of them were throw-aways?I agree that both teams take a small step backwards, but so have we. Seahawks prob run away with the division and it'll be a 3 team race to get to 10 wins.