Ramifications
Guest
I would prefer to be @ #4 that's it. Moving down to #8 is just too far to go down IMO. It would cost the Vikings much to get us to move down 6 spots. All the Browns give up is the pick they got for a slow non effective RB Richardson and their #4 pick not a bad trade for them.
1-Houston-DE
2-Vikings-QB (trade)
3-Jax- QB
4-Cleveland QB
5-Oakland-WR Watkins
6-Atlanta OT
7-Tampa Bay-OT or Barr
#8- StLouis likely miss out on both OT's & WR leaving us looking @ two LB'ers or CB Dennard as the best prospects. I am not happy with this.
Good post (I agree with #15 above, too, about ATL).
I'll be disappointed if we don't get Robinson, Watkins or Matthews, which probably means we can't go too much lower than CLE or OAK (or ATL, if they surprise and have to get Clowney, if HOU or a team that trades into the #1 spot takes QB).