- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 34,971
- Name
- Stu
Re: Top 10 Worst Coaches Ever. Guess who's #2?
The fact is that you can say that coach X could have done a better job. But look at it. Ryan clearly stepped into a situation where he DID have the pieces. Shanahan clearly had a better situation and an owner who doesn't think twice about spending huge jack. Norv has a pretty loaded team and inherited an even better one. Andy Reed and the Eagles? Fuhgettaboutit. The Chiefs are in a free fall. The Vikes are tied with us in futility - what's their excuse? The Bucs were supposed to be on the rise. They are 4-7.
That we are not the Packers or the Steelers or the patsies after 3 years does not mean another coach or GM would have done better.
I am not advocating for some long term contract for Spags and BD but I also would like to see them get at least one more year so we can see if this team is going somewhere. I would agree that in many situations, 3 years would be enough. In this case? Not so sure. I also would point out that in almost all the teams you listed in your original post, there was a lot of dissension in the ranks. I don't see that here.
The fact is that you can say that coach X could have done a better job. But look at it. Ryan clearly stepped into a situation where he DID have the pieces. Shanahan clearly had a better situation and an owner who doesn't think twice about spending huge jack. Norv has a pretty loaded team and inherited an even better one. Andy Reed and the Eagles? Fuhgettaboutit. The Chiefs are in a free fall. The Vikes are tied with us in futility - what's their excuse? The Bucs were supposed to be on the rise. They are 4-7.
That we are not the Packers or the Steelers or the patsies after 3 years does not mean another coach or GM would have done better.
I am not advocating for some long term contract for Spags and BD but I also would like to see them get at least one more year so we can see if this team is going somewhere. I would agree that in many situations, 3 years would be enough. In this case? Not so sure. I also would point out that in almost all the teams you listed in your original post, there was a lot of dissension in the ranks. I don't see that here.