Ok I’ll say it: Woods, Cooks and Kupp are a quality and proven group of receivers. Top 5 easily.
Our tight end group might be unproven, but Gurley is either #1 or 2 (L Bell) in the NFL as a receiver out of the backfield.
Why set parameters for best receiver groups that include tight ends but not the running backs?
In the hoopla of NFL rule changes with the kickoff did we all miss the new rule that running backs are now ineligible receivers? No.
So why eliminate the running back when rating receiver groups? Renders the ratings meaningless.
I mean, it’s like saying: Hottest actresses of the ‘80s! (Except for the face)
1. Jamie Lee Curtis.
Ok. But the face is kind of a big deal. In NFL passing game, so is the running back.