Thanks for taking the time to respond,
@Austin 
***************************************************
that anyone knows for certain who has cheated and who has not, and what context there is for that, and what effect that has had
**********************************************************************************
When tape goes missing or a cell phone is destroyed, then it's tough to prove anything. Any person or organization who does that is attempting to hide proof of their guilt. You can mark the ascendancy of the Patriots with the downward trajectory of the Rams when they met in the Super Bowl. That to me is the effect cheating had. Since the 2002 season...
Patriots: 185 wins
Rams: 87 wins
My main memory of that game is three-fold, 1) screaming at the TV for the refs to call the blatant holding of Marshall Faulk and other Rams players 2) screaming at the TV for Mike Martz to adjust his game plan 3) The image below from half-time
Whether the Patriots filmed the Rams before the game is unknown. Some say yes, some say no. Did the league collude with the refs to hand the win to the underdog Patriots? You make the call. While a lot of the blame as far as I'm concerned goes to Martz's stubbornness and inability to adapt his game plan to what was going on, my deep dislike for all things Patriots is because that game is when things began to unravel for the Rams.
Take a look at this...Keep in mind that this is from the East-Coast loving guys at ESPN.
***********************************************************************************
http://www.espn.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/13533995/split-nfl-new-england-patriots-apart
Don Van Natta Jr./Seth Wickersham
Spygate - During the first half of the New England Patriots' game against the New York Jets at Giants Stadium, a 26-year-old Patriots video assistant named Matt Estrella had been caught on the sideline, illegally videotaping Jets coaches' defensive signals.
April 1, 2008, the NFL commissioner convened an emergency session of the league's spring meeting at The Breakers hotel in Palm Beach, Florida. Attendance was limited to each team's owner and head coach.
Robert Kraft, the billionaire Patriots owner stood and apologized for the damage his team had done to the league and the public's confidence in pro football.
Then the Patriots' coach, Bill Belichick, the cheating program's mastermind, spoke. He said he had merely misinterpreted a league rule, explaining that he thought it was legal to videotape opposing teams' signals as long as the material wasn't used in real time. Few in the room bought it. Belichick said he had made a mistake -- "my mistake."
Goodell had imposed a $500,000 fine on Belichick, a $250,000 fine on the team and the loss of a first-round draft pick just four days after league security officials had caught the Patriots and before he'd even sent a team of investigators to Foxborough, Massachusetts.
Those investigators hadn't come up empty: Inside a room accessible only to Belichick and a few others, they found a library of scouting material containing videotapes of opponents' signals, with detailed notes matching signals to plays for many teams going back seven seasons.
Among them were handwritten diagrams of the defensive signals of the Pittsburgh Steelers, including the notes used in the January 2002 AFC Championship Game won by the Patriots 24-17.
Yet almost as quickly as the tapes and notes were found, they were destroyed, on Goodell's orders: League executives stomped the tapes into pieces and shredded the papers inside a Gillette Stadium conference room.
To many owners and coaches, the expediency of the NFL's investigation -- and the Patriots' and Goodell's insistence that no games were tilted by the spying -- seemed dubious. It reminded them of something they had seen before from the league and Patriots: At least two teams had caught New England videotaping their coaches' signals in 2006, yet the league did nothing.
Further, NFL competition committee members had, over the years, fielded numerous allegations about New England breaking an array of rules. Still nothing. Now the stakes had gotten much higher: Spygate's unanswered questions and destroyed evidence had managed to seize the attention of a hard-charging U.S. senator, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, who was threatening a congressional investigation.
This would put everyone -- players, coaches, owners and the commissioner -- under oath, a prospect that some in that room at The Breakers believed could threaten the foundation of the NFL.
Goodell tried to assuage his bosses: He ordered the destruction of the tapes and notes, he insisted, so they couldn't be exploited again. Many in the room didn't believe it. And some would conclude it was as if Goodell, Kraft and Belichick had acted like partners, complicit in trying to sweep the scandal's details under the rug while the rest of the league was left wondering how much glory the Patriots' cheating had cost their teams.
"Goodell didn't want anybody to know that his gold franchise had won Super Bowls by cheating," a senior executive whose team lost to the Patriots in a Super Bowl now says. "If that gets out, that hurts your business."
Just before he finished speaking, Goodell looked his bosses in the eye and, with dead certainty, said that from then on, cheaters would be dealt with forcefully. He promised the owners that all 32 teams would be held to the same high standards expected of players. But many owners and coaches concluded he was really only sending that message to one team: the New England Patriots.
IN AUGUST 2000, before a Patriots preseason game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Jimmy Dee, the head of New England's video department, approached one of his charges, Matt Walsh, with a strange assignment: He wanted Walsh to film the Bucs' offensive and defensive signals, the arm waving and hand folding that team coaches use to communicate plays and formations to the men on the field.
******************************************************
Click the link above if you want to read the whole, humongous article. But you get the point. The Patriots have developed cheating into an art form. Whether everyone does it is irrelevant to me. If the Rams were caught doing this type of thing it would seriously tick me off.
Sigh, it looks like, unless karma intervenes with Tom Brady, we will be having this discussion for a few more years.
****************************************************************************
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/05/15/tom-brady-targets-playing-until-45-for-now/
Tom Brady targets playing until 45, for now
Posted by Mike Florio on May 15, 2017
At at time when the question of
Tom Brady or
Jimmy Garoppolo continues to loom for the Patriots in 2018, Brady has reiterated that he intends to play for half a decade beyond that.
“I always said my mid-40s, and
naturally that means around 45,” Brady told Ian O’Connor of ESPN.com.
There’s one caveat that first emerged after Super Bowl LI, when Brady revealed, apparently jokingly, that his wife was pressuring him to walk away while on top.
“She makes decisions for our family that I’ve got to deal with,” Brady said. “Hopefully she never says, ‘Look, this has to be it.’ . . . My wife and my kids, it’s a big investment of their time and energy, too.”
Brady added that Ms. Brady has signed off on his target of 45, again with a caveat: “She also wants me to take good care of myself and still have my energy. My kids have grown up faster than I thought.”
This doesn’t mean 45 is the definite ending point. Brady seems to be willing to reassess once he gets there, before deciding whether to keep going.
“”If I get there and I still feel like I do today, I don’t see why I wouldn’t want to continue,” Brady said. “If you said 50, then you can say 60, too, then 70. I think 45 is a pretty good number for right now. I know the effort it takes to be 40. . . . My love for the sport will never go away. I don’t think at 45 it will go away. At some point, everybody moves on.
Some people don’t do it on their terms. I feel I want it to be on my terms. I’ve got to make appropriate choices on how to do that, how to put myself in the best position to reach my long-term goals.”
That’s the key takeaway — he wants to walk away on his own terms and not based on what anyone else decides. But, again, there’s another caveat. He sounds as if could be willing to stay with the Patriots as the backup to the next starter.
“When you’re a member of a team sport, the best guy plays,” Brady said. “So I always want to make sure I’m the best guy, and I give our team a great chance to win. But if you’re ever not [the best guy], part of being a great teammate is letting the other guy do that, as well.
Competition is what has always driven me. I’ve never been one that was hand selected, to be this particular player. . . . In high school, college, professionally, I think the greater the competition, the more that it really allows me to dig deep and bring the best out of me.”
The problem for Brady arises when the very best he can bring is no longer better than someone else’s. Would he try to start for another team? Would he eventually hold a clipboard?
For now, no one knows, including Brady. The one thing that we do know is that Father Time eventually will remain unbeaten.