I thought you were going to ask about lemon jelly or lemon filling.
Because it's definitely jelly.
Because it's definitely jelly.
Time to settle the war!
- Thread starter Boffo97
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Ferragamo was always my favorite when I was growing up and he quickly became a fan favorite but man, was he frustrating. I'd love to have seen him get coached up by the likes of an Arians or somesuch.
Mentioning Haden, I'm having a hard time deciding if Ryan Fitzpatrick or Austin Davis is the closer modern day equivalent? I think Haden had it from the neck up but just didn't have the physical tools. Hard to think of Fitz and Davis in that regard.
Mentioning Haden, I'm having a hard time deciding if Ryan Fitzpatrick or Austin Davis is the closer modern day equivalent? I think Haden had it from the neck up but just didn't have the physical tools. Hard to think of Fitz and Davis in that regard.
Got that shit right!
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #25
I tried to be neutral and say it was lemon jelly filling.
LosAngelesRams
Hall of Fame
Cullen Bryant
Rookie
That’s a tough one. Statistically speaking it’s darn close, if you believe in QB ratings Ferragamo had a 70.1 and Haden had a 69.6 not so great and their TD/INT were horrible. Being a teenager back then I remember always leaning towards Ferragamo but now I find myself leaning towards Haden, brains over beauty, c’mon you got to admit Ferragamo was a handsome man
While I agree their respective passer ratings weren't impressive, a big part of that was the philosophy of the time. Especially the Rams. Run, run and then pass on 3rd down. Maybe. Usually if it was a long situation. So, long yardage in a predictable situation as a big chunk of one's passing attempts is going to skew the numbers downward.That’s a tough one. Statistically speaking it’s darn close, if you believe in QB ratings Ferragamo had a 70.1 and Haden had a 69.6 not so great and their TD/INT were horrible. Being a teenager back then I remember always leaning towards Ferragamo but now I find myself leaning towards Haden, brains over beauty, c’mon you got to admit Ferragamo was a handsome man
But Ferragamo was the perfect L.A. QB in that he was movie star handsome and a bit of an underdog story when he played in the Super Bowl.
Ferragamo was the man
My first Rams game live was 1978 Rams at New York Giants. Haden was the QB, I remember it looking liek he was trying to throw a nerf ball in a windstorm...
My first Rams game live was 1978 Rams at New York Giants. Haden was the QB, I remember it looking liek he was trying to throw a nerf ball in a windstorm...
I personally think Roman Gabriel was better looking, But I have no photos of him without his Helmet on to prove it!That’s a tough one. Statistically speaking it’s darn close, if you believe in QB ratings Ferragamo had a 70.1 and Haden had a 69.6 not so great and their TD/INT were horrible. Being a teenager back then I remember always leaning towards Ferragamo but now I find myself leaning towards Haden, brains over beauty, c’mon you got to admit Ferragamo was a handsome man
Rams have often had movie-star like QB's. Waterfield, Gabriel, Ferragamo, Everett even Warner. I think all of them appeared in movies and tv as a matter of fact.
And Rosey Grier and Freddy Dryer.You Forgot Merlin Olsen!
But see... that's exactly what it is. Even @-X- knows that deep in his heart of hearts. Truth is he even admitted it to me in a moment of weakness. He's such a softy.
