The last thing we need is for McVay to have more of anything.
What we really need is a bit of grounding. Humble pie. We’ve crowned the guy too soon.
I disagree Dog (re: crowning McVay too soon).The last thing we need is for McVay to have more of anything.
What we really need is a bit of grounding. Humble pie. We’ve crowned the guy too soon.
To be clear....I’m not down at all on our coach. He’s still an electrifying person and I’m glad we got him. I’m just saying that we may have seen him become mere mortal, and should resist giving him more responsibility until he proves he can handle what he currently has. There were enough doubts cast last year and I’d like to see those put to rest.I disagree Dog.
IMO McVay is the best thing to happen to this organization since Vermiel came out of retirement for us. He is the face of the franchise. Or should be IMO. 90% of the coaches in the NFL would have finished .500 or less with that roster he started the season with. The OL dice roll that came up snake eyes was bad enough, but then the Gurley situation on top of it was simply brutal.
That last game vs the 9ers shows how good McVay is. We had no business playing them to the last possession like we did. McVay is why that happened, his moving pocket with the boots and rollouts neutralized Bosa and allowed us to compete. So for me it's critical that the Rams get right in supporting him and keep that MFer in horns. The dude is 32. He's gonna get better and better.
Right on. And I think you are correct.I’m just saying that we may have seen him become mere mortal, and should resist giving him more responsibility until he proves he can handle what he currently has
The thing you arent taking into account is the philosophy that trading draft picks for proven talent is better than drafting unknown players.
I'm not saying it IS better - just that it is one way to go. And IMO we haven't made a trade that I felt was terrible.
Fans have a tendency to over value draft picks - you want to have more shots at it but I like their combination of trading and drafting, and trading the first round picks doesn't bother me. Their first draft was unbelievable and it appears their third will turn out really well too.
I think it's time to identify a core (Goff/Kupp/AD/Ramsey so far) to keep at all costs and then build around them with draft picks (and stop trading those picks away)
I disagree. There's no proven model that trading draft picks for established players works. It's a short team move where if you don't win that season or the one after you begin to feel the pain. We're in the stage right now. Obviously you have to draft well or either approach is bad. But it's always better to have guys on their rookie deals. Especially when you're in a cap situation like ours.The thing you arent taking into account is the philosophy that trading draft picks for proven talent is better than drafting unknown players.
I'm not saying it IS better - just that it is one way to go. And IMO we haven't made a trade that I felt was terrible.
Fans have a tendency to over value draft picks - you want to have more shots at it but I like their combination of trading and drafting, and trading the first round picks doesn't bother me. Their first draft was unbelievable and it appears their third will turn out really well too.
I think it's time to identify a core (Goff/Kupp/AD/Ramsey so far) to keep at all costs and then build around them with draft picks (and stop trading those picks away)
True. But what determines a "win now" mentality is letting him know he's on thin ice. He's got a track record I feel I can act on right now (plenty of track record and for me he's too free with picks) if I'm the owner but would let him finish this offseason and see how the team looks.
Context is important. Read slower maybe?The Rams are in good shape . You make me laugh that The Rams are in a win now situation. Should be that every season,!you want to LOSE NOW??