sjm1582002
Wanted everywhere but welcome nowhere
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 965
Saints are giving up 4.7 yards a rush.
Gurley time..
The Rams scored the majority of their 33 in the span of about 8 minutes so by stalling I mean the entire first half. And the talk of the cowboys eagles game was how the eagles offense started ice cold and Dallas couldn't take advantage. Also, I like the saints more but not defensively. That Vikings front seven is among the best.I don't consider putting up 30+ points on the Texans really stalling. Would you consider the Eagles offense poor last night even tho they scored 37? It was pretty much the exact same game. Only scored 7 in the first half and then lit it up the second. There's 60 minutes of football, not 30.
Yesterday yes we stalled, but we didn't look terrible, we literally fumbled away that game just like the Seattle game. Would we still have won if Kupp doesn't fumble? Who knows, who cares. We lost, and we couldn't keep up in the 2nd half and the Viks are just the better team atm. Not to say we can't beat them but they seemed more sure themselves than we did. And that goes a long way.
The Saints are just as good as the Viks and I actually think they would beat the Viks mostly because of Brees, he has a solid running attack now so it's a double edged sword. I don't know if we would play better against the Saints, maybe we're a better matchup, i dunno. Time will tell.
The Rams scored the majority of their 33 in the span of about 8 minutes so by stalling I mean the entire first half. And the talk of the cowboys eagles game was how the eagles offense started ice cold and Dallas couldn't take advantage. Also, I like the saints more but not defensively. That Vikings front seven is among the best.
Yeah. Hopefully this past game really put some hair in our chestsYeah but that's what I'm referring to tho. I don't think they stalled against the Texans, the texans just did a solid job in the first half against us.
As far as the saints vs the viks. I think that matchup would come down to the QB's.
Yeah. Hopefully this past game really put some hair in our chests
Yeah but they dont have Case Keenum.I am concerned about NO’s offense
Hopefully we have Webster and Hill back, huge upgrades over Hatfield.I seriously DONT think our defense will be able to slow down the Saints offense. If we cant stop the Vikings, how do we expect to stop The Saints? Unless we're super fortunate, this will be a loss for us. Our offense and defense looks like last year's Rams. We won't be able to beat the Saints nor Eagles but the rest we should be okay
Let's see...Saints defense looks good
Ingram and Kamara specifically. Not many have stopped either one of them this year.I am concerned about NO’s offense
Some guy named Breeze.
Anyone ever heard of this guy, any good?
Key to winning this game is to have NRC and Webster BOTH healthy. If we have Hatfield and Countess playing one on one again, Brees may bury us so deep we won't be able to catch up.
I don't think the Saints defense is that good. Redskins put up 31 yesterday. Most of the teams the Saints have been slowing down have average/below average offenses. I don't see the offense being an issue.
Defensively....if you set aside last year, we've kind of owned Brees. Especially considering how much better the Saints were than the Rams for that bad 10 year stretch. Obviously the big concern is that running game after yesterday - but I've always believed teams come off of wins and losses differently. 1-1 was my goal for these two tough games back to back, and the defense having been gashed by Minnesota sets them up for some revenge - plus we have quite a few guys that were on the D last year who remember what the Saints did to us.
This is a game we should win IMO.