I was just about to post the question, What was the Rams record in 1998? 4-12, the year before? 5-11 Nine consecutive seasons without going to the post-season yet they win the Super Bowl the next season. So let the so called experts and pundits squawk all they want. This year's team may do incredible things and the only people that see that it is possible just may be us here at ROD. That's fine with me. Makes the party that much sweeter!!!!!:rockon::cheers::rockon:
Exactly. Without comparing directly to that '99 team, I see similarities. This may not be the Perfect Storm of '99, but this team is turning into something special. I love being under the radar, too.
Media types are just lazy sheep, for the most part. They scan headlines, go along with the IN crowd, and don't want to ruffle any feathers. No independent journalistic research. No unbiased eye.Lazy
The exceptions, unfortunately, are either fan-boys for the positive, or agenda-driven guys for the negative. (I hate Stan!, I hate that the Rams 'abandoned STL', or I am a Niner, or Shehawk stooge!) And that is what we are seeing a lot here.
Case in point, the main story emphasized Sammy Watkins being injured a lot, but not the upside to the Rams. They emphasized the 2nd round pick we gave up, and how PARCHED the Rams are for draft picks to fill this
talentless roster!
Then they said we gave up a
starting cornerback, in Gaines. Now, all reports are EJ was doing well in camp, but I think it was clear he sat behind Tru, Webster and Robey-Coleman. But, when your narrative is "the Rams are fools", you list him as a starter.
