So those metrics are false? Bradford really hasn't been hurt often? Bradford's cap number is not high? Other QB's haven't done more with equal or lesser talent?
Everyone quickly bashes/dismisses any criticism of Bradford
It's not about dismissing. It's about not agreeing with your version of "reality". Many on here have broken down actual game tape on Sam. We've noted the issues. I don't think many are saying he is the definition of greatness or anything. You can't ignore the circumstances, go by only stats, and make a blanket statement that it's time to move on. If you do, expect those who don't agree to NOT AGREE.
I look at the QBs that have supposedly lit it up as rookies. Most of them truly have NOT lit it up in reality. Some have but most have played ok while a very good team around them has paved the way. But name the QBs that have come into the league since Bradford. How many would you really take ahead of him? How many of them have actually improved the play of those around them?
There have been 47 QBs drafted since Sam was drafted - 47! Of that list, 11 have been 1st rounders. There is ONE QB other than Sam on that list I would want heading up my team. There maybe 6 truly starting quality QBs out of those 47 besides Sam. Are you really going to sit there and say any of the 2014 QBs are going to buck that trend? MAYBE is a bad choice to me.
We are not trying to build a team through FA here. So far, I don't really see Sam's contract being anything that holds us back. Can you name a player we have missed out on because we couldn't afford him?
So - it's not that we come to Sam's defense. It's (at least for me) that I've heard it ad nauseum. I get it. It's an opinion that I view as wrong headed. But you're entitled to that. Just don't accuse those who don't agree with you of sticking their head in the sand. If anything - it's stat junkies and people who refuse to look at all aspects that are ignoring the information readily available to them.