Unfortunately, we are heading towards something of a rebuild IMO.
Those that say our defense is great - I disagree. The production does not match the investment IMO.
Re-sign all of them? Imagine for a moment that we did - Jenkins $10 mil/year, TruJo $7 mil/year, McCleod $4 mil/year.
That would put the total financial $$ spent on D on par with the Seahawks I think - considering what we've gotten from the defense, we cannot tie up that much money for that unit. I love Jenkins, I have his jersey, but at this point I would not re-sign him because I think he will want too much money; let's re-sign TruJo instead.
Changes....here goes:
Re-sign - TruJo, Barron, McCleod
Cut - Cook, Long, Saffold, Bailey, Britt
At WR - keep only Tavon, but shop him and see what we could possibly get - might be able to get a 1st or 2nd rounder as I think Tavon would be a monster in a good offense.
Free Agency - way too much of a crap shoot to rely on anything, so try to get some veteran WRs.
Let's assume we trade Tavon for a 2nd rounder, which gives us 3 2nd round picks. Also assume we land two vet WRs.
With our 1st 4 picks, draft QB, OL, WR, TE - load this offense up.
Oh and also a brand new coaching staff.
OR if we are to stick with Jeff Fisher...
Re-sign everyone on defense. Trade Foles, our two 2nd round picks and our 3rd pick for Philip Rivers - the Chargers do this because he's old and they need to rebuild.
With our 1st round pick draft the best offensive player available.
Go into next season hoping our OL doesn't get decimated by injuries - and Battle takes the LT job from Robinson, whom we move to guard. Our OL looks pretty good for the future.
I personally think it needs to be a complete rebuild at this point. Keep Gurley and some OL but all other skill players and QBs should be gone, along with the coaching staff.
Not if you have competent people doing it.A complete rebuild of the offense is not the answer. Did that this year, 9 new starters on opening day vs last year. Turn everything over and you're back to the same place you were at the start of this year.
Makes a person wonder on all three counts.1. Health
2. Better execution
3. Continuing development.
Makes sense. Let's pu some more resources in building the offense - starting with either seeing if we have a future stud QB in Mannion or drafting one if he's not. I would like a stud WR as well. Not sure what the future holds for this young O-line. I suspect they will be quite improved next season.I'd take a good QB, a stud WR, and 3 more offensive linemen (two FAs and one draft)
This of course is subject to change based on how the rest of the season plays out, but that's it so far.
Yeah. What's weird is that what's happening now with Foles & Keenum is the same thing that happened to Bradford over and over again. New OC, new receivers, injuries across the line, and general lack of continuity. Fisher, to me, isn't so omnipotent that he can crush the offense single-handedly. Particularly since he's the one who keeps bringing in all these new players and coaches to get it right. I agree that there should be more continuity, and that can only happen when you have players playing together for good stretches of time. But that doesn't eliminate the need for difference-makers - like a Holt or Bruce or Warner. I guess we need a little bit of both. More continuity and a difference maker or two to take some pressure off of those who need more time to develop.Makes sense. Let's pu some more resources in building the offense - starting with either seeing if we have a future stud QB in Mannion or drafting one if he's not. I would like a stud WR as well. Not sure what the future holds for this young O-line. I suspect they will be quite improved next season.
I honestly think much of the play calling is pretty good. The execution has been abysmal but I'm not sure who is to blame for that. I don't see any real strength in the QB position. The two we have had play this season just don't seem to be able to deliver like the position needs.
One thing that I realize is very unpopular right now though is that I'd like to see some continuity. Let these guys actually get comfortable in the offensive assignments. I'm not saying that if we have a QB that can't make plays, we stick with him. I would actually say that is where I would put most of my eggs. But the rest of the offense needs to get on the same page and if the O-line improves like I think they will and we have the QB position figured out, the plays will be there and the players will make the plays.
Right. We just brought in a true play maker at RB. We have a young O-line that IMO doesn't look like chopped liver. A difference making QB may be what it takes. I admit that I have never been impressed by either Foles or Keenum so I may be biased about that. Still, I would so much like to see what at true stud QB could do in this offense.Yeah. What's weird is that what's happening now with Foles & Keenum is the same thing that happened to Bradford over and over again. New OC, new receivers, injuries across the line, and general lack of continuity. Fisher, to me, isn't so omnipotent that he can crush the offense single-handedly. Particularly since he's the one who keeps bringing in all these new players and coaches to get it right. I agree that there should be more continuity, and that can only happen when you have players playing together for good stretches of time. But that doesn't eliminate the need for difference-makers - like a Holt or Bruce or Warner. I guess we need a little bit of both. More continuity and a difference maker or two to take some pressure off of those who need more time to develop.
Agree with all unfortunately but I would keep Brian Quick. I'm not quitting on him yet. Give him a full offseason and see if he can get it together.My personal wishlist:
1) New head coach----Jeff has lost any of my confidence to right the ship. No sure who I want as a replacement.
2) Resign all defensive players----keep what appears to be our strength.
3) Offense needs a total overhaul----the only ones I'd keep are the rookies and Austin.
:baghead::headexplosion::baghead::headexplosion: