A lot of people on the Pead bandwagon. Hope he proves me wrong. To me if winning the division is our goal then at minimum we need to split the series with Seattle. With it being so tough to win up there with their fake crowd noise, we absolutely need to win this first game. In order to do that we need Cunningham and Pead to come up big for us. Pead needs to avoid the mental mistakes that have plagued him so far.
Well, Tyson was devastating with his punches..but again, who was he fighting? Ali was fighting the best of the best: Sonny Liston, Joe Frazier, Ernie Shavers, Jimmy Young, George Foreman, and others...I brought up Jimmy Young and Ernie Shavers, because many (including myself) thought Ali lost to both of those guys..But they didn't knock out the Champ, so it is what it is.... Ali was most devastating by using his intelligence...Ali would have nailed Tyson with superior jabs, and would have worn Tyson down for 10-15 rounds..like he was prone to doing with other heavy hitters. I actually didn't like Ali back then..I thought he was a draft dodging loud mouth...But I give the guy his due...he was the greatest I ever saw.That may be true. You might have a point.
But that's secondary to each other's punching power.
Ali was great at picking his shots, and he had some power, but Tyson bullied people and threw devastating shots.
It really would be great to see those two fight in some sort of parallel universe.
Come on - think about the heavy weight division over the years. There have been very few times when it wasn't a shambles. Ali fought some outright jokes for fighters. Frazer was a hard punching, slow footed Neanderthal. Ali might have been able to peck at Tyson as he came in and keep him off balance. But that he let Frazer catch him so many times tells me that Tyson would have walked him down and made him hear bluebirds chirping. I used to club fight a bit and was really into boxing. The heavyweight division was always what got the headlines but the fighters really were some of the worst in boxing. And that definitely include the days of Ali.c'mon bro...I don't buy that for a minute...He WOULDN'T have knocked out Ali or Frazier> Hell, he wouldn't have knocked out Jimmy Young or Ernie Shavers! Foreman was young dumb and full of..well, you know..So he might have been stupid with Tyson. But still, Tyson was a good fighter when the Heavyweight Division was turning to crap. I agree that he probably beats Norton and Holmes, but then maybe not.
I sure wish that was the case...Just got back from the future, and all debates are now official over.
We are going to disagree..Tyson fought warmed over losers. He was a tiger amoung sheep, no doubt...Forman was slow...lol..yeah..even when he was 40ish, he was kicking heavyweight division Azz in the 90's. As for the FASTEST punch..who was faster Ali or Tyson? You know its Ali....Come on - think about the heavy weight division over the years. There have been very few times when it wasn't a shambles. Ali fought some outright jokes for fighters. Frazer was a hard punching, slow footed Neanderthal. Ali might have been able to peck at Tyson as he came in and keep him off balance. But that he let Frazer catch him so many times tells me that Tyson would have walked him down and made him hear bluebirds chirping. I used to club fight a bit and was really into boxing. The heavyweight division was always what got the headlines but the fighters really were some of the worst in boxing. And that definitely include the days of Ali.
Go back and watch Foreman fight. The guy was big and had about the slowest punch I've seen to this day. He just had such a thick skull and was so tall that he could launch one of those curling stones he called fists and if you hit him twice on its way in, that was ok for him. Until of course he suddenly looked like someone roofied him.
I couldn't stand Tyson once King got hold of him. But before that, I had never seen anyone with that combination of ability and aggressiveness.
Oh I saw Ali too. Granted, I was kinda young, but I remember his style very well.Well, Tyson was devastating with his punches..but again, who was he fighting? Ali was fighting the best of the best: Sonny Liston, Joe Frazier, Ernie Shavers, Jimmy Young, George Foreman, and others...I brought up Jimmy Young and Ernie Shavers, because many (including myself) thought Ali lost to both of those guys..But they didn't knock out the Champ, so it is what it is.... Ali was most devastating by using his intelligence...Ali would have nailed Tyson with superior jabs, and would have worn Tyson down for 10-15 rounds..like he was prone to doing with other heavy hitters. I actually didn't like Ali back then..I thought he was a draft dodging loud mouth...But I give the guy his due...he was the greatest I ever saw.
OK, sure. I was a RB, and WR on offense, so when I say that. I'm looking at the yards that he can get. For instance, sometimes, a LB blows through the hole and meets you at the hand off, or the designed play, where you are supposed to go, is walled off, or plugged.Explain anyway. I already like it.
I haven't looked it up in a while..but last time I looked, Ali and Floyd Patterson had the fastest jabs in the history the of Heavyweight Division....Ali was a master at so many things, including defense. Tyson relied on the quick knock out, and he was devestating at it...but then again, the best atheletes used boxing as their way out of bad circumstances from the early 1900's to the 1970's. Kids dreamed of being a boxing champ...But not so much in the 80's, 90's until today..the best didn't choose boxing.....This is why (IMHO) Tyson's performance seemed so devastating against lesser competition...Oh I saw Ali too. Granted, I was kinda young, but I remember his style very well.
To me, it comes down to punching power and speed. And I don't think anyone has the chin to take a Tyson hook and stay upright.
I agree that Shavers won that fight. An argument could be made that Young won as well. And Leon Spinks? Really? Ali was a great pure boxer when he came to fight. I just don't think he could have fended off a Cus managed Tyson.Well, Tyson was devastating with his punches..but again, who was he fighting? Ali was fighting the best of the best: Sonny Liston, Joe Frazier, Ernie Shavers, Jimmy Young, George Foreman, and others...I brought up Jimmy Young and Ernie Shavers, because many (including myself) thought Ali lost to both of those guys..But they didn't knock out the Champ, so it is what it is.... Ali was most devastating by using his intelligence...Ali would have nailed Tyson with superior jabs, and would have worn Tyson down for 10-15 rounds..like he was prone to doing with other heavy hitters. I actually didn't like Ali back then..I thought he was a draft dodging loud mouth...But I give the guy his due...he was the greatest I ever saw.
I din't bring up Spinks because Ali was old...He had balance and the best jab I ever saw..Tyson never experienced a jab like that. Ali wasn't a power puncher, yet he had power to knock a guy out. Tyson had a compact, tight punch that just knocked people the eff out. To me, Ali had more skills that should have given him the advantage...Too bad we'll never know.I agree that Shavers won that fight. An argument could be made that Young won as well. And Leon Spinks? Really? Ali was a great pure boxer when he came to fight. I just don't think he could have fended off a Cus managed Tyson.
Yep. Fun to talk boxing though with someone who was actually around and watched it back in the day.I din't bring up Spinks because Ali was old...He had balance and the best jab I ever saw..Tyson never experienced a jab like that. Ali wasn't a power puncher, yet he had power to knock a guy out. Tyson had a compact, tight punch that just knocked people the eff out. To me, Ali had more skills that should have given him the advantage...Too bad we'll never know.
Remember Spinks brother?Yep. Fun to talk boxing though with someone who was actually around and watched it back in the day.
Oh, we know. What you never played Mike Tyson's Punch-out?? SMH.I din't bring up Spinks because Ali was old...He had balance and the best jab I ever saw..Tyson never experienced a jab like that. Ali wasn't a power puncher, yet he had power to knock a guy out. Tyson had a compact, tight punch that just knocked people the eff out. To me, Ali had more skills that should have given him the advantage...Too bad we'll never know.
You mean shortest title fight in history Michael?Remember Spinks brother?
That man was scared, and ran all the way to the bank. As far as the jab. In shape, Mike, he got inside that, and just flurried on your ass, imposing his will, never waited to eat a jab.You mean shortest title fight in history Michael?
Man, I wish I had you on the RODcast with me. Woulda been a good conversation.I haven't looked it up in a while..but last time I looked, Ali and Floyd Patterson had the fastest jabs in the history the of Heavyweight Division....Ali was a master at so many things, including defense. Tyson relied on the quick knock out, and he was devestating at it...but then again, the best atheletes used boxing as their way out of bad circumstances from the early 1900's to the 1970's. Kids dreamed of being a boxing champ...But not so much in the 80's, 90's until today..the best didn't choose boxing.....This is why (IMHO) Tyson's performance seemed so devastating against lesser competition...
I paid so much money for that fight. Between the hotel, the food, and the keg. We rented a room at a Holiday Inn, I think, and there were about 20 people in there. We were all getting geared up for it. Drinking, havin some pizza, getting all excited for it.You mean shortest title fight in history Michael?
Funny - a bunch of us rented a hotel room and bought pay per view. The pre-fights were all scrambled for some reason then while we were on the phone with the cable company, the main event came on. Barely had time to freshen my drink.