The St. Louis Rams: Better or Worse?

[CGI_Ram]

Richardson= 475
Pead= 54

So, 1655 and 6 TDs? I'm still thinking that's well within the realm of possibility.

Yep.

There are running backs who make plays (Peterson, Faulk, etc) but a good amount of them benefit and perform because of the oline. With the Rams; I'm totally comfortable with our RB situation because I love this oline. These RB's will get their yards.

My only concern is the blocking and ball security.

 

[albefree69]

CGI_Ram wrote:
My only concern is the blocking and ball security.

Which blocking? RBs? TEs? Or the O-line itself?

And if you say the O-line itself then that sorta negates your statement about loving our O-line doesn't it?
As for the RBs and TEs, I really don't care all that much about their blocking as long as they can run and catch.

 

[CGI_Ram]

CGI_Ram wrote:
My only concern is the blocking and ball security.

Which blocking? RBs? TEs? Or the O-line itself?

And if you say the O-line itself then that sorta negates your statement about loving our O-line doesn't it?
As for the RBs and TEs, I really don't care all that much about their blocking as long as they can run and catch.

Oops...

Blocking by the RB's! (In particular... protecting the QB)

The oline will open holes for these guys.

 

[albefree69]

CGI_Ram clarifies his position:
Blocking by the RB's! (In particular... protecting the QB)

Makes sense.

Everyone remembers that block of PW by SJ that allowed Sam to throw that TD. I get it but if the O-line is as improved as much as you think it is then how important will that be? I'm not worried at all. That block by SJ last year wouldn't have been made by almost any other RB in the league.