It was a "pop up" so I thought he could have , add that and the eschewed FG and we have a game, if Long keeps going on the offsides forcing an "unabated to the QB" instead of the "freeplay" where Fisher sez JJ got caught watching the "flags fly" instead of covering, we didn't HAVE to lose and so much of this was youthful inexperience.Ramhusker said:I think so if the ball hadn't hit the ground. I can't remember if he skipped that one up or not.
bluecoconuts said:He could have as I believe it was a pop fly, but I doubt that crossed his mind. It wouldn't have crossed my mind either, I think everyone was taken by surprise there, he was just reacting. I don't think he returned kicks or punts in college either (but I could be wrong there) which made it even more unnatural for him.
From wiki answers:bluecoconuts said:Well true it's on the coaches to teach everything they can, but there's only so little time. Plus it's easy to look back and say they should have been ready, but really when it's the heat of the moment a lot of times it comes down to just reaction, and it's time consuming to practice surprise onside kicks all the time (since you can't really practice the element of surprise other than throwing one in every so often)..
Murphy's law man, no plan survives contact with the enemy.
No that;s right and WHY you have to go over it in practice so JMO that was mostly a coaching problem.DR RAM said:Yes. He could have fair caught it, but you don't have a lot of time to process that, and then perform it.
I wouldn't sit here and assume that they haven't. In fact, if I did assume, I'd assume that they have. I've been on the hands team, and I've had the ball kicked to me on an onside kick. It scares the crap out of you even if you are expecting it, and Tru certainly wasn't.Thordaddy said:No that;s right and WHY you have to go over it in practice so JMO that was mostly a coaching problem.DR RAM said:Yes. He could have fair caught it, but you don't have a lot of time to process that, and then perform it.
Thordaddy said:It was a "pop up" so I thought he could have , add that and the eschewed FG and we have a game, if Long keeps going on the offsides forcing an "unabated to the QB" instead of the "freeplay" where Fisher sez JJ got caught watching the "flags fly" instead of covering, we didn't HAVE to lose and so much of this was youthful inexperience.Ramhusker said:I think so if the ball hadn't hit the ground. I can't remember if he skipped that one up or not.
Yeah they are young and that mistake was something that HAPPENS even to experienced teams,but the surest way to repeat a mistake is to rationalize it or excuse it. These guys are professionals paid well and their performance is IMO subject to critique.ramsince62 said:Thordaddy said:It was a "pop up" so I thought he could have , add that and the eschewed FG and we have a game, if Long keeps going on the offsides forcing an "unabated to the QB" instead of the "freeplay" where Fisher sez JJ got caught watching the "flags fly" instead of covering, we didn't HAVE to lose and so much of this was youthful inexperience.Ramhusker said:I think so if the ball hadn't hit the ground. I can't remember if he skipped that one up or not.
Correct, and young teams are going to make mistakes, it's all part of the process. The thing is, I think a lot of folks are forgetting just how young and inexperenced this team is. Some folks were talking about "re-evaluating their expectations"....me, heck, they've already exceeded mine. This is a fine young team and at the cost of repeating myself......"Just Wait Until Next Year"
Then let's dissect the decision-making on that play. This was going to be a routine kick-off; no one expected the onside kick. So now Tru (a rookie who's task here is get in the way of tacklers) is watching the ball come to him. "I better catch it!" There aren't many veterans who are going to think fair catch on an onside kick, which is typically bounced in any case.Thordaddy said:Yeah they are young and that mistake was something that HAPPENS even to experienced teams,but the surest way to repeat a mistake is to rationalize it or excuse it. These guys are professionals paid well and their performance is IMO subject to critique.ramsince62 said:Thordaddy said:It was a "pop up" so I thought he could have , add that and the eschewed FG and we have a game, if Long keeps going on the offsides forcing an "unabated to the QB" instead of the "freeplay" where Fisher sez JJ got caught watching the "flags fly" instead of covering, we didn't HAVE to lose and so much of this was youthful inexperience.Ramhusker said:I think so if the ball hadn't hit the ground. I can't remember if he skipped that one up or not.
Correct, and young teams are going to make mistakes, it's all part of the process. The thing is, I think a lot of folks are forgetting just how young and inexperenced this team is. Some folks were talking about "re-evaluating their expectations"....me, heck, they've already exceeded mine. This is a fine young team and at the cost of repeating myself......"Just Wait Until Next Year"
It was an error, Tru and the rest of the team need to learn from it and BTW I'm NOT calling for anyones head, JUST calling the possibiities into question because point of fact is Tru could have protected himself and gotten us some pretty damned good field position IF he'd made the smart play there.
It's one of three errors in that game that combined had they NOT happened IMO this team could easily have won,and basicaly my point is, FUZZ NEXT YEAR,these guys are GOOD ENOUGH physically to compete NOW and LEARNING from these mistakes can only make them better.
I'm NOT picking on anyones little sister,just posing questions about how we could have done better.
Ram Quixote said:Then let's dissect the decision-making on that play. This was going to be a routine kick-off; no one expected the onside kick. So now Tru (a rookie who's task here is get in the way of tacklers) is watching the ball come to him. "I better catch it!" There aren't many veterans who are going to think fair catch on an onside kick, which is typically bounced in any case.Thordaddy said:Yeah they are young and that mistake was something that HAPPENS even to experienced teams,but the surest way to repeat a mistake is to rationalize it or excuse it. These guys are professionals paid well and their performance is IMO subject to critique.ramsince62 said:Thordaddy said:It was a "pop up" so I thought he could have , add that and the eschewed FG and we have a game, if Long keeps going on the offsides forcing an "unabated to the QB" instead of the "freeplay" where Fisher sez JJ got caught watching the "flags fly" instead of covering, we didn't HAVE to lose and so much of this was youthful inexperience.Ramhusker said:I think so if the ball hadn't hit the ground. I can't remember if he skipped that one up or not.
Correct, and young teams are going to make mistakes, it's all part of the process. The thing is, I think a lot of folks are forgetting just how young and inexperenced this team is. Some folks were talking about "re-evaluating their expectations"....me, heck, they've already exceeded mine. This is a fine young team and at the cost of repeating myself......"Just Wait Until Next Year"
It was an error, Tru and the rest of the team need to learn from it and BTW I'm NOT calling for anyones head, JUST calling the possibiities into question because point of fact is Tru could have protected himself and gotten us some pretty damned good field position IF he'd made the smart play there.
It's one of three errors in that game that combined had they NOT happened IMO this team could easily have won,and basicaly my point is, FUZZ NEXT YEAR,these guys are GOOD ENOUGH physically to compete NOW and LEARNING from these mistakes can only make them better.
I'm NOT picking on anyones little sister,just posing questions about how we could have done better.
In every win this year, Fisher would tell you they need to improve on _____. He's not going to tell you different about yesterday. But to say the Rams could "easily win" without those 3 mistakes does not take into account GB and Rodgers.
I'm not one to make less of our offense's efforts, or our defense's, but even taking away the big plays on the offsides, the Packers still have the ball. And Rodgers was so hot ... thinking ... the Ram DBs might as well have been so many cheese on toast, grilling on the dome turf. I'm not saying the Rams couldn't win, but they certainly wouldn't have won "easily."
I'm not putting anything "on a rookie? I didn't put him on the field.Ram Quixote said:I still think you're putting too much on a rookie.
1. Unexpected onside kick -- Fisher said they were all surprised. It's one thing to be prepared for the unexpected, another to execute.
2. An unusual kick -- most are dribbled or kicked down to create the high bounce, which prevents the possibility of a fair catch.
3. In the split-second in which Tru realizes it's an onsides, and the 2-3 seconds he has before the ball gets there, does he even have time to raise his hand high enough to signal fair catch and then catch it?
4. With the Packers moving in to separate him from the ball, and certainly succeeding (they wouldn't stop in any case), what about the refs? Will they allow the fair catch, called late and in an unusual circumstance?
That's quite a bit to process. I mean, yeah. It would have been ultra-cool for Tru to have called a fair catch to foil the onside kick. So much that we would all have been stunned. When did you think of the fair catch?
What is "reasonable" obviously dictates that the opposite is "unreasonable".Ram Quixote said:Is it reasonable to expect a fair catch on an onside kick, a play that in all likelihood has never happened before?
It seems more reasonable to just wish he had been able to hold onto the ball while 2 opposing players hit him high and low.
I don't agree. I still believe you're expecting an incredibly heads-up play. One that would be talked about and shown on highlights.Thordaddy said:I can't imagine why when it would occur to me would matter,WHEN it would occur to me is in training camp IF it was my job to teach these guys.
Everyone agrees that it was a mistake,