duckhunter
Starter
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2013
- Messages
- 908
The call on Dunbar bothered me a lot more because he did not make contact with his head at all….really it was like he just touched his jersey. That is a ref anticipting a hit that didnt happen. I cant agree with you on the call on the Boldin hit. I dont think it was an intential thing but having watched it 3 or 4 times I see him hitting him in the helmet….again, not GOING for his head and Boldin was moving, so, I dont like the call but it is going to get called.
I agree with you both the non call with Givens and TA.
But either way this is a sloppy team and this plays right into it. Kap has had four good passing games. GB, Wash and St. Louis twice. Our pass D blows plain and simple.
Washington lost, thats good.
I'll have to watch the Trumaine hit again. I might be transposing it and Dunbar's hit. Anyway, another poorly called game and we didn't do much to help our own cause. I suppose at least the refs in our game were good enough not to move the chains forward and then right back the next play. What jokes.![]()
This is my problem with the officiating in any NFL game. There is no transparency in their "corrective measures." All we ever see is things like Brockers' not being fined for his penalty, or the refs from the Carolina game not letting today's game get away from them. The NFL doesn't allow criticism of the officiating. Why? Because Goodell and his office doesn't hold the officials responsible. They like the ambiguous rules that allow so many different interpretations. It's their version of Murphy's Law in every game.
Not to mention this also allows them to influence how the games are officiated.
I agree. And that makes the entire situation a conflict of interest. There isn't any desire to improve the officiating because they have control of the product.As a longtime sports fan, one of the things that has become more & more obvious to me is that referees, officials, and assorted persons are regarded as representing the authority of the league, association, or whatever the parent sports body calls itself. Any attacks on an official is treated as an attack on the authority of the parent body itself, and that is never tolerated in any sports league.
I agree. And that makes the entire situation a conflict of interest. There isn't any desire to improve the officiating because they have control of the product.