Elmgrovegnome
Legend
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2013
- Messages
- 22,780
We'll see if Liam can get him going. Turn him loose on crossing patterns from some trips. Will be interesting to see what he does in preseason like last year. Maybe if he shows effort like McVay says he can sneak into the O this coming year.
No they shouldn’t been sending him over the middle. Too much risk of getting lit up. I’d give him mostly sideline routes or deep routes so he can get out of bounds or at least with some space he may be able to go down.
Ben was a good blocker and he also made some plays. I doubt Tutu can be an effective blocker. Plus the Rams traded Woods, because they signed a talker receiver with great ability to make contested catches. The drafted Skowronek and Harris, all tall receivers that fit. Tutu will be at a weight and height disadvantage competing with these receivers.And this is my issue with your takes, right here.
Skowronek was on the game day roster and was a negative.
So he really doesn't.
Humphries played better than Allen. So if you consider potential over the next three years, assuming they both improve Humphries still ends up being the better player. However as I stated before, it would be the same take on Atwell even if Humphries was off the board.The weird thing about the first one is that Brian Allen was the starting C on a Super Bowl winning team.
I guess people are playing Madden in their heads and assuming a rookie center would have been able to do what Allen could - being in his FOURTH year under McVay.
That's.......a stretch. Allen is likely light years ahead of Humphrey mentally.
For that reason I wouldn't trade Allen for Humphrey right now.
This thread has mainly been focused on Atwell.