Spider2YB
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- May 2, 2015
- Messages
- 2,544
But that’s what happened. He chose $40M in LA over $50M in LV or NY.I might vomit when the "Stafford is taking less money because he wants to be a Ram" nonsense comes out
But that’s what happened. He chose $40M in LA over $50M in LV or NY.I might vomit when the "Stafford is taking less money because he wants to be a Ram" nonsense comes out
Lol, he was already making 40 mill this season, if they increased his cash to 40 from 27 he basically is getting 53But that’s what happened. He chose $40M in LA over $50M in LV or NY.
I'm not so sure. A pick swap at least. If you're willing to pay the guy 100 million guaranteed I have to believe you wouldn't be stingy on the draft price.Giants 100% would not give up their #1 pick
He had teams willing to trade for him and pay him $10M more than the Rams did. As well as include an extra year in the deal. The only way you couldn’t read this as Stafford choosing less money to stay in LA is if you already had some kind of weird personal vendetta against him.Lol, he was already making 40 mill this season, if they increased his cash to 40 from 27 he basically is getting 53
It's a great day but we have plenty of work to do before we're back in Superbowl contender talk imo.I don't mean to say "I told you so"... but I told you so!!!
Rams are SB contenders!!!!
I don't mean to say "I told you so"... but I told you so!!!
Rams are SB contenders!!!!
Schefter is plugged in with the Giants almost more than any other team and he is adamant they were never trading that pick.I'm not so sure. A pick swap at least. If you're willing to pay the guy 100 million guaranteed I have to believe you wouldn't be stingy on the draft price.
The Giants aren’t going to take a QB at 3 *and* sign Aaron Rodgers. Won’t happen. If they felt really good about either QB they wouldn’t be entertaining the idea of Stafford or Rodgers.Huh? Neither team would give up their #1 pick so each QB was always in play
Schoen and Daboll have both said the #3 pick was not on the table, they've always had plans to move up to #1 if Stafford wouldnt workI'm not so sure. A pick swap at least. If you're willing to pay the guy 100 million guaranteed I have to believe you wouldn't be stingy on the draft price.
Well I am inclined to believe Schefter. He and rappaport are the big dogs.Schefter is plugged in with the Giants almost more than any other team and he is adamant they were never trading that pick.
I wouldn't listen to a GM saying they wouldn't move a pick. That would be bad negotiating. But it does sound like people close to them felt the same (that they wouldn't move it).Schoen and Daboll have both said the #3 pick was not on the table, they've always had plans to move up to #1 if Stafford wouldnt work
Don't skip free agency!Well I think this worked out well overall. Now on to the draft.
Lol. Where do you think Schefter got the info?I wouldn't listen to a GM saying they wouldn't move a pick. That would be bad negotiating. But it does sound like people close to them felt the same (that they wouldn't move it).
Yeah there's a lot of misunderstanding about what his current contract is and what this new deal might actually mean.Lol, he was already making 40 mill this season, if they increased his cash to 40 from 27 he basically is getting 53
But it’s still less than what was on the table. And not just the money but the years too. He coulda gotten $100M guaranteed from LV.Yeah there's a lot of misunderstanding about what his current contract is and what this new deal might actually mean.
If you're saying he got it from the GMs mouth then I trust it even less lol. Why would I tell a reporter during a negotiation that I might give up more than I want if it came down to it?Lol. Where do you think Schefter got the info?