- Joined
- Aug 27, 2013
- Messages
- 618
He wasn't very good. Just an average back with questionable vision, IMO.
Yeah.. and we now have the best two back system in the league.
He wasn't very good. Just an average back with questionable vision, IMO.
Stacy has fumbled 3 times. Cunningham 3 and Mason 2. Not much difference.Fumbling the ball. Simple as that. Whether his fault or not.
Our model is ball security, position, and defense.
Because it's his job? How many players ride the bench? Most of them. What makes Zac so special that he can demand anything? I understand if he's clearly a starter and he wants to start. But he's not a clear starter anywhere.
Stacy is a nifty runner, nice pad level, good balance, decent acceleration, good feet, good vision and very good in pass pro.
I don't see him as a throw away player at all.
Why he's in this spot, I have no idea, but he's no Daryl Richardson where his shelf life is limited. He can play in this league and may just need a fresh start.
Would a team like a rookie or a young guy who's already run for basically 1k as a rookie who already understands how to pass pro as a professional RB.
He may not be worth a 3rd, but for teams that have a lot of picks that need guys to stick, Stacy could be a nice 3rd day option.
Perhaps, but alot of people including NFL GM's watched Stacy run roughshod over Seattle's defense that night on MNF.Mojo, I gotta say, that seems pretty generous. Maybe we can package Stacy with a pick to move up in the 4th or 5th round. At best, he's something to sweeten the pot in a trade. Otherwise, he's worth a super late pick in the 2016 draft and possibly only a conditional one at that.
I would go for a conditional pick for next year and hope the draft is better. This draft is weak.I'll take a 6th rounder for him, bout all you're going to get.
A reporter who doesn't pay much attention to the Rams outside of relocation under values one our players? Where's my sarcasm font?