Well he's the closest thing hype wise to RG in this draft,I agree the REAL " separation" isn't there, but it wasn't "there" with RG either
Some Info From Inside the Rams
- Thread starter RamBill
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Well he's the closest thing hype wise to RG in this draft,I agree the REAL " separation" isn't there, but it wasn't "there" with RG either
True that. We could easily laugh at some of their professional opinions and picks too. I could have pee'd on the Pead pick. What scout is responsible for that fiasco!
If Clowney goes and Rams can't get a trade down, I'm rooting for Watkins. Dude's a beast. His hands are like fly paper. I know we need O line and all, but that's BPA in my humble opinion. I would then try to work my way up to Robinson or Mathews.
If we are to believe this guy, then the Rams view it as just Clowney and then quite a drop off. Hard to say how many teams feel like that, but if true that would make the no.1 overall pick quite a bit more valuable than the no.2 overall pick.
Yamahopper
Hall of Fame
Clowney is at top of most if not all boards.
Watkins? Translation, Yeah he's better but the drop off in WR isn't as steep as it is at other positions.
If your going to fix the Oline do you do it with a T in the first or a G in the 2nd? That would depend on the Clowney conundrum. Take Clowney and might have to trade up to get Lewan.
If they do read boards I'm sure they get the giggles at times. It's no different as say a electrical engineer reading electrical help boards run by laymen and thinking "Geez I don't want them to wire my house". He could have left that part out because it discredited his story.
Whether any of it was true doesn't matter, it just echos what is said on a daily basis.The first round is idiot proof this year unless they trade down to far.
Watkins? Translation, Yeah he's better but the drop off in WR isn't as steep as it is at other positions.
If your going to fix the Oline do you do it with a T in the first or a G in the 2nd? That would depend on the Clowney conundrum. Take Clowney and might have to trade up to get Lewan.
If they do read boards I'm sure they get the giggles at times. It's no different as say a electrical engineer reading electrical help boards run by laymen and thinking "Geez I don't want them to wire my house". He could have left that part out because it discredited his story.
Whether any of it was true doesn't matter, it just echos what is said on a daily basis.The first round is idiot proof this year unless they trade down to far.
Fair enough, that probably was a strawman. Even still, big difference between a professional writer and some poster on a football forum. Bernie's antagonizing is very unprofessional for getting paid to do what he does, but I don't see the need for such formalities around here.
fearsomefour
Legend
duckhunter
Starter
I am vindicated with this inside info on Kenny Britt.
Only I, The Great Karnac, wise man from the east, soothsayer, seer, mystery revealer, listed Kenny Britt as our next great pro bowler.
(Better Berniefy my comment) If he doesn't make the cut, I knew that magic ball I got from the garage sale was no damn good.
Only I, The Great Karnac, wise man from the east, soothsayer, seer, mystery revealer, listed Kenny Britt as our next great pro bowler.
(Better Berniefy my comment) If he doesn't make the cut, I knew that magic ball I got from the garage sale was no damn good.
Elmgrovegnome
Legend
Scouts and NFL people laughing at fans? That's rich, they are wrong about draft picks just as often as anyone. I love the arrogance. Being an NFL scout doesn't make you right, if it did then Devanney would be the greatest GM of all time. He loved looking at tape and scouting to the point that he tracked down Beathard and sucked,well you know, until he got a job. Kiper loved Claussen, most loved Vernon Gholston.
Where does any NFL type get off ripping on draft fans?
That being said, the piece was written like a horoscope, like stated earlier.
Where does any NFL type get off ripping on draft fans?
That being said, the piece was written like a horoscope, like stated earlier.
Yamahopper
Hall of Fame
Yamahopper
Hall of Fame
I read it somewhere around combine time. It doesn't make sense at first. If they don't go QB. Then with a need before long to replace Johnson's production who better than Watkins? They have to know if they trade down Clowney is gone for sure and maybe Robinson/ Mathews. They would still risk losing Watkins if they traded down past 4. So if they want to upgrade the offense and give support to the QB they take in the 2nd they might just take Watkins. Clowney is graded better than any other player, but not by that much.
Texans still have a decent team talent wise, but they have a big decision on what to do with that 1st pick.
Texans still have a decent team talent wise, but they have a big decision on what to do with that 1st pick.
Yup, that's an ugly shot at the fan base that is so instrumental in the success of the NFL business. "Anyone" are people... human beings for Christ sakes - we're entitled to an opinion. Would they rather have us all just shut up and put our wallets back in our pockets? Who's going to support their ridiculous coaching salaries then?
Said the man who controls the money supply. Take a lesson from the international banking cartel and just crank up those printers
No, by all accounts there are 4 elite prospects in this draft: Clowney, Robinson, Watkins, and Mack and would be considered elite prospects in any draft