- Joined
- Jul 27, 2010
- Messages
- 31,123
Nobody has really said anything about metcalf’s play that could’ve cost them the game. Time was running out and they have no TO’s, all you need him to do is step out of bounds to stop the clock, instead he turns up to get a few more yards. Of course I’m rooting for the Steelers but I’m like wth is he doing?DK Metfumble
Metcalf is insanely talented but he is a stupid and selfish fuckwad of a player. It's crazy how the Seahawks seem to gravitate towards those types.Nobody has really said anything about metcalf’s play that could’ve cost them the game. Time was running out and they have no TO’s, all you need him to do is step out of bounds to stop the clock, instead he turns up to get a few more yards. Of course I’m rooting for the Steelers but I’m like wth is he doing?
Metcalf is insanely talented but he is a stupid and selfish fuckwad of a player. It's crazy how the Seahawks seem to gravitate towards those types.
Last year was great when he was throwing sideline tantrums and Williams knew they were gonna force him the ball and he got that INT. Just a beautiful moment.
Not being smart enough let alone having the feel to know he should show respect to a Hall of Famer. I mean that says it all tbh.
Glad this knucklehead (I'm being polite) isn't on the Rams. Instead we have the most unselfish and maybe the smartest receivers in the league, starting with Woods and Kupp.Cool. Helps to keep the anger flowing through freely.
Hell yeah. Glad we have a good culture.Glad this knucklehead (I'm being polite) isn't on the Rams. Instead we have the most unselfish and maybe the smartest receivers in the league, starting with Woods and Kupp.
Did he forget that sharp was a HOF TE with multiple Super Bowls and Pro Bowl appearance… it’s not like Tim (not Matt) Hasselbeck called him out! SMHThis prick is a POS talking to Sharpe like that. Seattle is the perfect place for this kind of trash.
Metcalf is an idiot.
Who says “I could wipe my shit with yours”
Was Metcalf also a writer on Happy Gilmore?