Smollett gets all charges dropped

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Status
Not open for further replies.

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,932
Jrry, you’re a lawyer, tell me this: Is “zealous defense” the only charge of a defense lawyer, truth be damned?

There are some limitations, but you also can't tie their arms behind their backs. They have to represent their client, guilty or not.

Forgive me for invoking “one party town”. Let’s go with “corrupt town”. What I said is absolutely correct. Maybe this thread will be deemed political, and I respect that, but I merely stated the facts reported in the news.

Okay, post the news article. The one I read from the NY Post painted a completely different picture.
 

coconut

Pro Bowler
Joined
Dec 15, 2018
Messages
1,680
Name
coconut
Somewhere along the line something happened and people need to be held accountable. At this point other people should be going to jail with that freaking turd Smollett.

I'd bet he was going to roll over on someone and that someone couldn't risk the bad press.
 

Farr Be It

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 1, 2017
Messages
3,965
There are some limitations, but you also can't tie their arms behind their backs. They have to represent their client, guilty or not.



Okay, post the news article. The one I read from the NY Post painted a completely different picture.
Ok. What was the NY Post article, by the way? Did I miss your posting of that article?


https://apple.news/AI5ZM2pwSN72gnak3Lnwl-w
 
Last edited:

Farr Be It

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 1, 2017
Messages
3,965
Seriously? Breitbart? Wow.
Les, are you the guy that quotes Huffpo and CNN?

You’ve been right on this issue until now, by why attack the source? Why not the truth of the assertions in the article?

Usually that is the classic fallacy in debate, when you are conceding the point.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #46
Les, are you the guy that quotes Huffpo and CNN?

You’ve been right on this issue until now, by why attack the source? Why not the truth of the assertions in the article?

Usually that is the classic fallacy in debate, when you are conceding the point.

I've probably quoted CNN, it's a solid news source for the most part. I've never really read or quoted Huffington. Brietbart is WAY to alt-right for me to consider worth my time. I'm not going any further than that, we both know their track record.
 

Farr Be It

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 1, 2017
Messages
3,965
I've probably quoted CNN, it's a solid news source for the most part. :blah::blah::blah::blah::blah::blah::blah:

This is how I read your response. Embarrassing.

Again, Address the assertions. Facts matter. You are right about one thing: Track record matters. CNN is not just nearly always wrong, they are culpable in perpetrating wicked lies.
 

Psycho_X

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
12,107
There are some true leaders of character up there in Chicago.

No wonder that city is basically the crime capital of the US.

They sure have a lot to be proud of.

Chicago is an embarrassment to most people who live in Illinois south of Cook County.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,932
Ok. What was the NY Post article, by the way? Did I miss your posting of that article?


https://apple.news/AI5ZM2pwSN72gnak3Lnwl-w

Didn't post it. Basic gist is:
1. Isn't a BO rep. She was former MO staff.

2. She called Foxx right after the supposed crime happened (3 days, iirc). This was before anybody knew Smollett lied.

3. She didn't make any requests with regard to charges. She asked that the FBI handle the investigation to lessen the chances of leaks.

That's why I called your post inaccurate. All that went down when people still thought it was a hate crime. It is not accurate to claim she called to tell Foxx to drop charges against Smollett or imply that BO was behind it.
 

Farr Be It

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 1, 2017
Messages
3,965
Didn't post it. Basic gist is:
1. Isn't a BO rep. She was former MO staff.

2. She called Foxx right after the supposed crime happened (3 days, iirc). This was before anybody knew Smollett lied.

3. She didn't make any requests with regard to charges. She asked that the FBI handle the investigation to lessen the chances of leaks.

That's why I called your post inaccurate. All that went down when people still thought it was a hate crime. It is not accurate to claim she called to tell Foxx to drop charges against Smollett or imply that BO was behind it.
I understand the nuances. Thanks for listing. Pretty much what is in the article I posted. All except the reasons for getting involved, and the “before anyone knew he lied” part.

1. Why were MO people concerning themselves with this matter to begin with?

2. What sane person didn’t know this was a laughable hoax day one, much less day 3?
 

coconut

Pro Bowler
Joined
Dec 15, 2018
Messages
1,680
Name
coconut
Didn't post it. Basic gist is:
1. Isn't a BO rep. She was former MO staff.

2. She called Foxx right after the supposed crime happened (3 days, iirc). This was before anybody knew Smollett lied.

3. She didn't make any requests with regard to charges. She asked that the FBI handle the investigation to lessen the chances of leaks.

That's why I called your post inaccurate. All that went down when people still thought it was a hate crime. It is not accurate to claim she called to tell Foxx to drop charges against Smollett or imply that BO was behind it.
The police suspected from the very start he was lying. As in immediately upon hearing his story and meeting him. By Day 3 it was obvious to those well connected thus the phone call.

Chicago Police Union has just announced that they are asking for a federal investigation and The Chicago Police Dept. has just released the case file to the public.
 
Last edited:

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #54
2. What sane person didn’t know this was a laughable hoax day one, much less day 3?

It was fishy from the start, but one has to let these types of things unfold.

As info came out it was obvious. And the police had info after a couple of days that we have just been informed of..........which is what @jrry32 had pointed out to you.

The police suspected from the very start he was lying. As in immediately upon hearing his story and meeting him. By Day 3 it was obvious to those well connected thus the phone call.

Chicago Police Union has just announced that they are asking for a federal investigation and The Chicago Police Dept. has just released the case file to the public.

Yeah if I am a cop and I show up to his place to get details and it's been 40 minutes and he's still wearing the noose around his neck red flags would be flying all over the place.

There should be an investigation, a complete dive into what happened, because something is as fishy as the original story. IMO he offered someone some money and they took it in exchange for getting the charges dropped. I suspect the deal that included community service (which I didn't know he actually did and haven't heard about) and letting the county keep his 100K bail isn't the whole story. First off did anyone hear about him doing community service? That was part of the statement, he had done enough.

There is more here than we know IMO. And I suspect his lawyers are involved in a dirty way considering their statement.

He should do some time, not 10 years, but 9 months maybe 12 and pay a hefty fine. And the party or parties that got the charges dropped needs to be held accountable. If they were paid off they need to be punished harshly.
 

Farr Be It

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 1, 2017
Messages
3,965
This is how I read your response. Embarrassing.

Again, Address the assertions. Facts matter. You are right about one thing: Track record matters. CNN is not just nearly always wrong, they are culpable in perpetrating wicked lies.
Chill @LesBaker ?

Awe. Thanks! (y) I think you’re pretty chill, yourself!

:pillowfight:
 

coconut

Pro Bowler
Joined
Dec 15, 2018
Messages
1,680
Name
coconut
and letting the county keep his 100K bail isn't the whole story.
I believe he only forfeited $10K. I think he was bought off on the state charges. Bought off meaning his silence on co-conspirators. Thats why federal charges have to be pursued. I suspect no one will be surprised to learn the names and their connections.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,932
The police suspected from the very start he was lying. As in immediately upon hearing his story and meeting him. By Day 3 it was obvious to those well connected thus the phone call.

Chicago Police Union has just announced that they are asking for a federal investigation and The Chicago Police Dept. has just released the case file to the public.

BS. Even if the police suspected it, a lawyer in private practice has no way of knowing, unless you are arguing that lawyer was connected in the PD. Of course, you have nothing to support that, and it still doesn't change the fact that said lawyer never called about Smollett being charged.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,932
I understand the nuances. Thanks for listing. Pretty much what is in the article I posted. All except the reasons for getting involved, and the “before anyone knew he lied” part.

1. Why were MO people concerning themselves with this matter to begin with?

2. What sane person didn’t know this was a laughable hoax day one, much less day 3?

1. She's not a MO person. She's a lawyer in private practice and is no longer working for MO. For all we know, she's acquainted with Smollett and his family (which is exactly what the story indicates).

2. Anyone who wasn't privy to the details. It was fishy, but without more, you can't just assume it's a hoax.
 

nighttrain

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
9,216
It

He should do some time, not 10 years, but 9 months maybe 12 and pay a hefty fine. And the party or parties that got the charges dropped needs to be held accountable. If they were paid off they need to be punished harshly.
 

Ramhusker

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
14,462
Name
Bo Bowen
Smollett is just lucky a riot didn't kick off as a result of his spineless lies and theatrics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.