- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Messages
- 35,576
- Name
- The Dude
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #101
I guess I would be wrong if I (or you) were talking about the passing yards last year.We didn't see this many men in the box each and every run play last year. And you are wrong on better production last year. Keenums starts last year we averaged 173 yards a game passing. We're doing better this year which still isn't good.
Let's recap.
You: we have at least 8 men in the box almost every time we run. If we had a passing game we wouldn't face that.
Me: Explain last year then. Same personnel, same level of QB play, better results.
For example. Last year, against Detroit, Keenum was the QB and Gurley had 140 yards rushing and 2 TDs. So I don't buy the reasoning that Keenum being the QB limits what Gurley can do, or that "if we had a passing game we wouldn't face that." Keenum had 124 yards passing in that game with zero TDs and one interception, yet Gurley ran wild. They weren't afraid of Keenum last year. They knew Gurley was our offense. The difference last year was that Cignetti was drawing up some decent run game plays, they were alternating in Tre Mason and Tavon Austin, they used motion, they used a lead blocker, and they were able to run on whatever front Detroit was rolling out. Even 7 or 8 in the box - like so:
My opinion is that the playcalling for Gurley - and the run game in general - is not nearly as creative as it was last year.
But it really is much easier to blame the QB. Especially when we have a generational talent on the bench. Everything will be A OK once he gets in.