What did Kaepernick have to do with Crabtree shoving him?That’s when he shoved my face, and that’s when I went off.
I threw a choking sign at 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick.
Then why bring it up? Passive aggressive much?It goes back to something he said to me this offseason in Arizona, but you’d have to ask him about that.
Bull and shit.When I say I’m the best cornerback in football, it’s with a caveat: There isn’t a great defensive backfield in the NFL that doesn’t have a great front seven
Nice insult to every team they've played so far.If you’re any kind of competitor and you have any kind of dog about you, you want to play against the best. Finally, we get the opportunity.
Let me just say this: "I float like a butterfly and sting like a bee."Angry Ram living in a closet:
I'm working toward a Master's in Environmental Science, specializing in environmental management. Haven't graduated yet (end of the year), but my cumulative GPA to date is 3.7.
It's not about grades and what letter he gets on a piece of paper.
It's about how he handles himself. The NFL is full of dumb players but I've never seen one that is so damn adamant about screaming to the world how he's the best at his position.
I think he is a good cover guy but not that great in run support, it may be their scheme but I still want to see my defensive guys playing run and pass. As far as getting in to Stanford that is an accomplishment in itself, whether or not he had help because of his football abilities who knows. It seems player students get a lot of help because of the money they bring in to the universities. I have heard he does some nice things in the community as we all should to our abilities.
All of those things do not excuse him for what he pulled at the end of that game. I really don't ever remember an opposing player going after a guy like he did trying to "congratulate" the other player before the end of the game. It was not genuine, it was just trying to show Crabtree up. And then his rant when Andrews "interviewed" him, a selfish me first guy that took away from a good team win to promote himself and his 1 play.
Last thing if he thought that was a BS holding call he should have been getting Jenkins treatment all year.
Let me just say this: "I float like a butterfly and sting like a bee."
They got this interview when his whole body was jam packed with adrenaline after having just made the game winning play. It's not what I'd have said but then again none of us will ever make that game saving play to get into the SB so who knows what I'd (or you) would say in those circumstances. The hyperbole surrounding what he said is so overblown that I'm just amazed. Not about the media's reaction because that's to be expected. No, I'm amazed at the comments I hear on a forum that consists of so many intelligent people.
I realize he's a Seahag but what's up with all the denigrating comments about his intelligence? Not only did he get a masters degree at Stanford, he did it while possibly not scoring that well on his SATs. This is taken by some to mean that he must have cheated or been "given" those grades. What it says to me is that the guy put in an incredible amount of work and effort to overcome his short comings (if any). Just the fact that he went for his master's says volumes to me. It's not what got you into Stanford, it's what you did with the opportunity that counts IMO.
Don't you think so?
Let me just say this: "I float like a butterfly and sting like a bee."
They got this interview when his whole body was jam packed with adrenaline after having just made the game winning play. It's not what I'd have said but then again none of us will ever make that game saving play to get into the SB so who knows what I'd (or you) would say in those circumstances. The hyperbole surrounding what he said is so overblown that I'm just amazed. Not about the media's reaction because that's to be expected. No, I'm amazed at the comments I hear on a forum that consists of so many intelligent people.
I realize he's a Seahag but what's up with all the denigrating comments about his intelligence? Not only did he get a masters degree at Stanford, he did it while possibly not scoring that well on his SATs. This is taken by some to mean that he must have cheated or been "given" those grades. What it says to me is that the guy put in an incredible amount of work and effort to overcome his short comings (if any). Just the fact that he went for his master's says volumes to me. It's not what got you into Stanford, it's what you did with the opportunity that counts IMO.
Don't you think so?
Sorry Angry, the only part of this that's directed at you is my answer to the bolded part of your post that I quoted. The rest is directed towards this whole thread.Angry Ram protesting that he's wrongly accused:
Who is questioning his intelligence? You don't need to be a genius to be classy.
Sorry Angry, the only part of this that's directed at you is my answer to the bolded part of your post that I quoted. The rest is directed towards this whole thread.
I got a little preachy there didn't I?![]()
I agree with the bolded part. Many colleges no longer require SAT or ACT scores for admission.Angry Ram continued:
Also side note: SAT/ACT tests are so pointless. No standardized test could ever accurately measure intellect.
I agree with the bolded part. Many colleges no longer require SAT or ACT scores for admission.
I disagree that it's pointless. The SAT test is not an IQ test and thus is not designed to measure intelligence.
It is designed to measure general knowledge levels and is designed to save the student from wasting his money and the college from wasting their time. Failure to score high enough on the test is often an indicator that they didn't learn enough in HS to have success in college. A person can, and is often required, to take remedial courses to correct their lack of knowledge. In addition, hard work can overcome these deficiencies but that's usually not successful which is why they invented the SAT in the first place.
I'll add my own side note: I also don't think IQ tests are a good measure of intelligence in that they are frequently jam packed with knowledge questions.
Angry Ram mistakenly thinking there's something else to talk about:
I wish I knew about these colleges.
Yeah I think I messed up my wording RE intellect. You are right they aren't IQ test. But I disagree with your disagreement of my pointlessness....
Well I can argue about that. I took the ACT THREE times. No score higher than a 25. That's just an "OK" score in my book. Yet I graduated top 15% in my high school class, had a 3.5ish GPA (it was around there), and was accepted to Sam Bradford's alma mater @ Oklahoma. Some transferring and applying later, here I am 11 months away from a Master's. I don't think the ACT measured my general knowledge. And the science portion isn't even real science...it's a glorified reading comprehension section.
Agree but now we're getting off a tangent here. Richard Sherman is still an annoying loudmouth.