OFFICIAL Senior Bowl Week

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
jrry32

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,491
I need to take a closer look at Arroyo. He was impressive in the bowl game against Iowa State. I hadn't watched much of him before that.
 
OldSchool

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
42,029
jrry32 said:
I won't be at all upset if we draft Mbow, but if we do, it'll likely have to be in the first or second round. I think he's too gifted and too savvy to fall to the third.
Click to expand...
Yeah I'm thinking 1st or a small trade back. Would likely want a free agent CB to take an OT with our first pick. The guy is good and has had a pretty impressive week.
 
Elmgrovegnome

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
23,576
I think Snead will be impressed with Jeff Bassa’s leadership skills this week.

Another good leader in this draft is Cody Simon.
 
TheTackle

TheTackle

Pro Bowler
Joined
Apr 3, 2015
Messages
1,346
One for Old School :)

I would love it if we drafted Lampkin and converted him to H back

I our scheme he could pick up a blitzer, act as a FB, help seal the edge

He’s unique

It would help if he can catch the ball but that would be a bonus. Can he block on the move? Hell yeh! He would be a force

collegefootballnetwork.com

NFL Teams Eye Unique Role for UNC's Willie Lampkin -- Fullback Move on the Table?

Currently enjoying a stellar week of practice, the former UNC lineman became the talk of Senior Bowl with a possible position change.
collegefootballnetwork.com collegefootballnetwork.com
 
Elmgrovegnome

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
23,576
Memphis Ram said:
Would you be opposed to using one of those 1st two selections in the trenches on defense?

I wouldn't. Make a strength even stronger.
Click to expand...

I’d be fine with it. BPA. The rotation would be upgraded and the entire unit would be fresher all game.


The Rams seem to have developed a formula for drafting that involves things that are difficult for us fans to pick up on with limited info on draftable prospects.

-leadership, with the rest they had developed by the guy from Walk Street.

-Dawg mentality

-by default older players (I think leadership and maturity come with age)

These characteristics make it difficult to get a sense of who the Rams may pick. There are a whole lot of prospects that won’t fit what they want. Like last year they only had three main first round targets -Bowers, Murphy, and Verse. That they felt were reachable from their pick.

I don’t do mocks but if I were to put the time in, then I’d be trying to consider these factors when choosing the picks.
 
OldSchool

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
42,029
Memphis Ram said:
Would you be opposed to using one of those 1st two selections in the trenches on defense?

I wouldn't. Make a strength even stronger.
Click to expand...
There are some great NT that I hope fall to us. Drafting an OT early entirely depends on FA.
 
RamFan503

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
35,342
Name
Stu
Memphis Ram said:
Would you be opposed to using one of those 1st two selections in the trenches on defense?
Click to expand...
I think the first pick has to be an impact player. Either OT, CB, or offensive threat.

I realize an interior d-lineman could be an impact player in that it could potentially make the defense an elite unit.

The second pick? I could see it though I think it’s likely we see an offensive piece there as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom