- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 30,431
No that’s not the only reason teams front load contracts. That’s not even close to true. You front load a contract because you have the cap space in year one in the case and it leaves room in year two. For instance if you think in year two you may resign your franchise QB for example.True Hill hasn't played but that doesn't equate to he's better than the other guys. It means he was a starter last year. A starter who got toasted often BTW. He was extended in May but the team left themselves an out after this season. So that means he's on a prove-it year...not a lot of confidence in a guy that has started 14 games for them. He needs to play better that is the bottom line. He's at best a very marginal starter which isn't good enough for a team that considers themselves elite.
The drafting of David Long shows what the Rams really think of Hill. Next year Hills base salary more than doubles to over $2.3M but his dead cap drops to $500K. Teams only front load contracts like this for players they have doubts about. If Hill has a breakout year they have him cheap next year as a potential starter. If not they can release him with minimal dead cap.
Why doesn't that game count? Because the niners were really trying and the entire defense was backups, making everyone's job harder?How can you say hes the same quality? Not one of these guys besides Hatfield has played a real NFL game. And we've seen what's happened to Hatfield when he plays a real game. The garbage time game against the niners 3 years ago doesn't count either.
I wish backup quarterback was a position that was up for grabs. Bortles is garbage. We are absolutely screwed if Goff goes down.
Although I am sure there were more available at the time of the Bortles signing. Matt Moore is someone that I would consider better than Bortles, who only just recently signed with the Chiefs. His (Bortles) record as a starting quarterback is 24-49 (yes, I get it the quarterback is not the only person on offense), having only one winning season. I would be willing to say that his stats are probably somewhat inflated due to a lot of garbage time. Have you guys seriously never watched this guy play? I do not understand why anyone would even think this guy is a capable backup. If Goff gets hurt, the Rams are screwed. With a backup, you should expect to have a chance. We have no chance with Bortles. This is my opinion, sort of like you thinking he is a capable backup is your opinion. The hope is that neither of us have to figure out who was right.Please name one backup QB better than Bortles.
I wish backup quarterback was a position that was up for grabs. Bortles is garbage. We are absolutely screwed if Goff goes down.
Passing | Rushing | Receiving | Fumbles | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Player | Tm | Cmp | Att | Yds | TD | Int | Sk | Yds | Lng | Rate | Att | Yds | TD | Lng | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Lng | Fmb | FL |
Blake Bortles | JAX | 23 | 36 | 293 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 29 | 98.5 | 2 | -2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Although I am sure there were more available at the time of the Bortles signing. Matt Moore is someone that I would consider better than Bortles, who only just recently signed with the Chiefs. His (Bortles) record as a starting quarterback is 24-49 (yes, I get it the quarterback is not the only person on offense), having only one winning season. I would be willing to say that his stats are probably somewhat inflated due to a lot of garbage time. Have you guys seriously never watched this guy play? I do not understand why anyone would even think this guy is a capable backup. If Goff gets hurt, the Rams are screwed. With a backup, you should expect to have a chance. We have no chance with Bortles. This is my opinion, sort of like you thinking he is a capable backup is your opinion. The hope is that neither of us have to figure out who was right.
I guess that means Allen and Wolford are worse than garbage. Sorry I have to disagree. Bortles is far better than the other two. All he needs to do is clean up his mechanics, improve his footwork and shorten his motion. That needs to be done in the offseason and Bortles will probably be gone next year.
Let's see Bortles threw 35 TD's behind a crappy o-line that gave up 51 sacks. That's garbage? The Jags have never had a good o-line. Goff was sacked more times last year than he's ever been and that was only 33 times. In his 5 year career, Bortles has been sacked only once lower than Goff and that was 31 sacks. He was sacked over 50 times twice in 5 years. Kinda hard to throw when you're constantly running for your life. But Bortles still managed to throw for 103 TD's in that time frame. That's not garbage.
His obvious technique issues have shown me he has never had proper coaching in Jacksonville. Clean up those technique issues and give him a decent o-line and he's probably a better than average QB. In fact, right now Bortles is comparable in many respects to QB's like Flacco and Dalton. That isn't bad to have as a backup QB. That's good enough to win games over a few starts should he be needed. Those wins could mean the difference between a SB or going home.