- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 49,667
- Name
- Burger man
![Mood: Kupp](/data/addonflare/moods/uploads/37.png?1633258520)
I think the Goff / Montana comparisons were good from the start.
Even Brady doesn’t/didn’t get the credit he deserves.
I believe it’s because the more traditional pocket passers skills are less obvious.... they are not physically visible (guys are either smaller, thinner, not runners, cerebral, etc). “It must be the system or situation that helps them”, etc.
Mahommes “looks the part”. It’s easy to see where he’s good because you see it more obvious when it’s physical skills that jump out. So, I can see why people fall for Mahommes easily. And... he deserves it. Just saying it’s easy to see with a player like him.
Even Brady doesn’t/didn’t get the credit he deserves.
I believe it’s because the more traditional pocket passers skills are less obvious.... they are not physically visible (guys are either smaller, thinner, not runners, cerebral, etc). “It must be the system or situation that helps them”, etc.
Mahommes “looks the part”. It’s easy to see where he’s good because you see it more obvious when it’s physical skills that jump out. So, I can see why people fall for Mahommes easily. And... he deserves it. Just saying it’s easy to see with a player like him.